作者: Bradley A. Gross , Ziad A. Hage , Marc Daou , Christopher C. Getch , H. Hunt Batjer
DOI: 10.1007/S11936-008-0026-9
关键词:
摘要: The goals of microsurgical and endovascular treatment intracranial aneurysms are to prevent subarachnoid hemorrhage and/or eliminate mass effect symptoms. Debate has raged regarding which treat with technique or combination techniques. It is our impression that studies have assessed aneurysm natural history options compromised by the inherent limitations clinical trials, many likely underestimating rupture risk over long-term follow-up. Endovascular therapy open neurosurgery should both be used strategically, current interest in integrating these techniques a fashion extending beyond simplistic clip-versus-coil debate.