Standpoint explicitness and persuasive effect: A meta-analytic review of the effects of varying conclusion articulation in persuasive messages
DOI: 10.1080/00028533.1997.11978023
关键词:
摘要: Argumentative explicitness is normatively good, because it opens viewpoints to critical scrutiny. But advocates might justifiably fear that such will compromise persuasive effectivenes...
questia.com参考文章(47)
Karen Whitehill King, The proceedings of the 1994 conference of the American Academy of Advertising American Academy of Advertising. ,(1994)
John F. Tunner, Ellen Day, Melvin R. Crask, Protection motivation theory Journal of Business Research. ,vol. 19, pp. 267- 276 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0148-2963(89)90008-8
Blair T. Johnson, DSTAT : software for the meta-analytic review of research literatures Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ,(1989)
J. Paul Frantz, Effect of Location and Procedural Explicitness on User Processing of and Compliance with Product Warnings Human Factors. ,vol. 36, pp. 532- 546 ,(1994) , 10.1177/001872089403600309
John T. Cacioppo, Richard E. Petty, Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches ,(1981)
Carl Iver Hovland, Muzafer Sherif, Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change ,(1981)
Kenneth L. Higbee, FIFTEEN YEARS OF FEAR AROUSAL: RESEARCH ON THREAT APPEALS: 1953-1968 Psychological Bulletin. ,vol. 72, pp. 426- 444 ,(1969) , 10.1037/H0028430
Bernard J. Fine, Conclusion-drawing, communicator credibility, and anxiety as factors in opinion change. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. ,vol. 54, pp. 369- 374 ,(1957) , 10.1037/H0040834
Dov Eden, Joseph Kinnar, Modeling Galatea : boosting self-efficacy to increase volunteering Journal of Applied Psychology. ,vol. 76, pp. 770- 780 ,(1991) , 10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.770
Kenneth H. Beck, Arthur Frankel, A Conceptualization of Threat Communications and Protective Health Behavior Social Psychology Quarterly. ,vol. 44, pp. 204- 217 ,(1981) , 10.2307/3033834