Delusions About Evidence: On Why Scientific Evidence Should Not Be the Main Concern in Socioscientific Decision Making

作者: Jan Alexis Nielsen

DOI: 10.1080/14926156.2013.845323

关键词:

摘要: This article takes issue with the widespread assumption that students’ socioscientific decisions ought to be evidence based. On basis of a careful conceptual analysis, it is argued misleading think in terms decision making because such process deliberation which persons distribute relative weights multifarious and incommensurate factors—a process, is, scientific has no privileged role. Accordingly, science educators focus on quality students discuss different considerations about issue.

参考文章(78)
Shirley Simon, Ruth Amos, Decision Making and Use of Evidence in a Socio-scientific Problem on Air Quality In: Sadler, T, (ed.) Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom Teaching, Learning and Research. (pp. 167-192). Springer Science & Business Media: Dortrecht, The Netherlands. (2011). pp. 167- 192 ,(2011) , 10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4_10
Hannah Bartholomew, Jonathan Osborne, Mary Ratcliffe, Teaching pupils 'ideas-about-science': Case studies from the classroom ,(2003)
Douglas N. Walton, Legal argumentation and evidence ,(2002)
Christian Kock, Multiple Warrants in Practical Reasoning Windsor Studies in Argumentation. pp. 247- 259 ,(2006) , 10.1007/978-1-4020-4938-5_16
Hanns Hohmann, Rhetoric and Dialectic: Some Historical and Legal Perspectives Argumentation. ,vol. 14, pp. 223- 234 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1007844811374
Christian Kock, Multidimensionality and Non-Deductiveness in Deliberative Argumentation Anyone Who Has a View. ,vol. 8, pp. 157- 171 ,(2003) , 10.1007/978-94-007-1078-8_13