Robotic assistance in gynecological oncology.
作者： Liselotte Mettler , Thoralf Schollmeyer , John Boggess , Javier F Magrina , Agnieszka Oleszczuk
DOI: 10.1097/CCO.0B013E328307C7EC
关键词:
摘要: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The da Vinci robot has proved to be the most advanced surgical system in gynecology. In this review we evaluated possibilities of applying robotic assistance improve gynecological endoscopic oncological surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: A literature survey on robotic-assisted oncology clearly supports use laparoscopic Robotic precision tumor excision, easier intracorporal suturing and favorable ergonomics for surgeon make particularly suitable performing complex microinvasive operations oncology. SUMMARY: surgery combines advantages open our opinion, may lead better results than conventional surgery, field However, opinion yet confirmed by randomized studies.
elsevier.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(47)
S. J. Belsley, A. Byer, G. H. Ballantyne, 1st International Congress of the Minimally Invasive Robotic Association (MIRA), 7–10 December 2006, Innsbruck, Austria. Congress summary: MIRA and the future of surgical robotics () The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. ,vol. 2, pp. 98- 103 ,(2006) , 10.1002/RCS.79
Dennis S Chi, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum, Yukio Sonoda, Joseph Ivy, Eunice Rhee, Kathleen Moore, Douglas A Levine, Richard R Barakat, None, The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgical staging of apparent stage I ovarian and fallopian tube cancers American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 192, pp. 1614- 1619 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.AJOG.2004.11.018
Hermann Hertel, Christhardt Köhler, Wolfgang Michels, Marc Possover, Roberto Tozzi, Achim Schneider, Laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH): prospective evaluation of 200 patients with cervical cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. ,vol. 90, pp. 505- 511 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00378-0
C. Diaz-Arrastia, C. Jurnalov, G. Gomez, C. Townsend, Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. ,vol. 16, pp. 1271- 1273 ,(2002) , 10.1007/S00464-002-8523-5
Lisbeth Tollund, Birgit Hansen, Jens Jørgen Kjer, Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal vs. abdominal surgery in patients with endometrial cancer stage 1. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. ,vol. 85, pp. 1138- 1141 ,(2006) , 10.1080/00016340600604195
B. Sert, V. Abeler, Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now? International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. ,vol. 3, pp. 224- 228 ,(2007) , 10.1002/RCS.152
Jayson B. Field, Michelle F. Benoit, Tri A. Dinh, Concepcion Diaz-Arrastia, Computer-enhanced robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. ,vol. 21, pp. 244- 246 ,(2007) , 10.1007/S00464-006-0894-6
Silvina Bocca, Laurel Stadtmauer, Sergio Oehninger, Current status of robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in reproductive medicine and gynaecology Reproductive Biomedicine Online. ,vol. 14, pp. 765- 772 ,(2007) , 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60680-3
N Kadar, Pelvic and Aortic Lymphadenectomy in Endometrial Cancer Journal of The American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. ,vol. 1, ,(1994) , 10.1016/S1074-3804(05)80916-8
Maurice J. Webb, 9 Radical hysterectomy Best Practice & Research in Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. ,vol. 11, pp. 149- 166 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0950-3552(97)80055-7