Philanthropy in health professions education research: determinants of success

作者: Robert Paul , Elisa Hollenberg , Brian D Hodges

DOI: 10.1111/MEDU.13231

关键词:

摘要: Context Fund-raising is a new practice in medical education research. Objectives This qualitative study explores cross-sectional analysis of philanthropy Canada and Europe identifies some common characteristics the fund-raising system, key roles research sites that have had success. Methods Medical received donations greater than Can$100 000 were identified by searching publicly available sources. Interviews conducted with 25 individuals from these other sites, four categories: leaders (n = 9); philanthropy-supported chairholders researchers (n = 5); donors over (n = 7), advancement professionals (n = 4). Interview transcripts inductively coded to identify themes. Results Five factors associated success accessing philanthropic sources sample: support organisation's senior leadership; charismatic champion who motivates donors; access an office or foundation; impetus find funds beyond traditional operating budgets, understanding conceptual practical dimensions fund-raising. Three types donor (medical insider, collective general philanthropist), faculty (trailblazers, rock stars, ‘Who? Me?’ people future fund-raisers) six stages cycle also identified. Conclusions Philanthropy source funding potential significantly advance research. Yet competence not widely developed among leaders. Successful requires ability articulate impact way will interest donors. This appears be challenging for leaders, tend frame their work academic terms trouble competing against domains. Medical institutes centres benefit developing conception practices

参考文章(41)
DeVries Ra, Private philanthropy in support of health service demonstrations and research. Health Services Research. ,vol. 16, pp. 7- 10 ,(1981)
Katie McDonald, Wendy Scaife, Print media portrayals of giving: exploring national ‘cultures of philanthropy’ International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing. ,vol. 16, pp. 311- 324 ,(2011) , 10.1002/NVSM.430
Kaspar Villadsen, Modern Welfare And ‘Good Old’ Philanthropy Public Management Review. ,vol. 13, pp. 1057- 1075 ,(2011) , 10.1080/14719037.2011.622675
Kim A. Margolin, Koen van Besien, David J. Peace, An Introduction to Foundation and Industry-Sponsored Research: Practical and Ethical Considerations Hematology. ,vol. 2007, pp. 498- 503 ,(2007) , 10.1182/ASHEDUCATION-2007.1.498
Jesse Roach, Elizabeth A. Jacobs, Grateful patient philanthropy: is what's good for the goose good for the gander? Journal of General Internal Medicine. ,vol. 28, pp. 608- 609 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S11606-013-2364-X
Jan D. Carline, Funding medical education research: opportunities and issues. Academic Medicine. ,vol. 79, pp. 918- 924 ,(2004) , 10.1097/00001888-200410000-00004
Michael L. Bentz, Jamil Ahmad, Rod J. Rohrich, Fundraising and Philanthropy in Plastic Surgery: An Essential Tool for Academic Excellence Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. ,vol. 127, pp. 2108- 2112 ,(2011) , 10.1097/PRS.0B013E31820E93C0
Frank A. Chervenak, Laurence B. McCullough, Milinda Fraley, Joe Golding, Ethics: an essential dimension of soliciting philanthropic gifts from donors. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 203, pp. 540- 541 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.AJOG.2010.04.032
Yonina R. Murciano-Goroff, Philanthropic partnerships and the future of cancer research Nature Reviews Cancer. ,vol. 15, pp. 125- 129 ,(2015) , 10.1038/NRC3862
Wesley E. Lindahl, Aaron T. Conley, Literature Review: Philanthropic Fundraising Nonprofit Management and Leadership. ,vol. 13, pp. 91- 112 ,(2002) , 10.1002/NML.13108