Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Multi-Sectoral Energy Transformation Pathways: Methodological Approach and Case Study for Germany

作者: Tobias Junne , Sonja Simon , Jens Buchgeister , Maximilian Saiger , Manuel Baumann

DOI: 10.3390/SU12198225

关键词:

摘要: In order to analyse long-term transformation pathways, energy system models generally focus on economical and technical characteristics. However, these usually do not consider sustainability aspects such as environmental impacts. contrast, life cycle assessment enables an extensive estimate of those Due complementary characteristics, the combination thus allows comprehensive assessments technically economically feasible pathways. We introduce FRITS, a FRamework for Impacts Transformation Scenarios. FRITS links bottom-up with impact indicators quantifies impacts strategies entire (power, heat, transport) over transition period. apply framework conduct multi-sectoral scenarios Germany. Here, ‘Target’ scenario reaching 80% reduction energy-related direct CO2 emissions is compared ‘Reference’ describing less ambitious pathway. The results show that 2015 scenario, performs better most indicators. resource consumption land use increase scenario. These are mainly caused by road passenger transport biomass conversion.

参考文章(37)
Peter Viebahn, Ole Soukup, Sascha Samadi, Jens Teubler, Klaus Wiesen, Michael Ritthoff, Assessing the need for critical minerals to shift the German energy system towards a high proportion of renewables Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. ,vol. 49, pp. 655- 671 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.RSER.2015.04.070
Stefan Pauliuk, Guillaume Majeau‐Bettez, Christopher L. Mutel, Bernhard Steubing, Konstantin Stadler, Lifting Industrial Ecology Modeling to a New Level of Quality and Transparency: A Call for More Transparent Publications and a Collaborative Open Source Software Framework Journal of Industrial Ecology. ,vol. 19, pp. 937- 949 ,(2015) , 10.1111/JIEC.12316
Elorri Igos, Benedetto Rugani, Sameer Rege, Enrico Benetto, Laurent Drouet, Daniel S. Zachary, Combination of equilibrium models and hybrid life cycle-input–output analysis to predict the environmental impacts of energy policy scenarios Applied Energy. ,vol. 145, pp. 234- 245 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2015.02.007
Geoffrey P. Hammond, Hayley R. Howard, Craig I. Jones, The energy and environmental implications of UK more electric transition pathways: A whole systems perspective Energy Policy. ,vol. 52, pp. 103- 116 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2012.08.071
Joana Portugal Pereira, Giancarlos Troncoso Parady, Bernardo Castro Dominguez, Japan's energy conundrum: Post-Fukushima scenarios from a life cycle perspective Energy Policy. ,vol. 67, pp. 104- 115 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2013.06.131
Fabio Menten, Stéphane Tchung-Ming, Daphné Lorne, Frédérique Bouvart, Lessons from the use of a long-term energy model for consequential life cycle assessment: The BTL case Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. ,vol. 43, pp. 942- 960 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.RSER.2014.11.072
Christoph Schlenzig, Energy planning and environmental management with the information and decision support system MESAP International Journal of Global Energy Issues. ,vol. 12, pp. 81- 91 ,(1999) , 10.1504/IJGEI.1999.000840
Johannes A. Drielsma, Andrea J. Russell-Vaccari, Thomas Drnek, Tom Brady, Pär Weihed, Mark Mistry, Laia Perez Simbor, Mineral resources in life cycle impact assessment—defining the path forward International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 21, pp. 85- 105 ,(2016) , 10.1007/S11367-015-0991-7
Edgar G. Hertwich, Thomas Gibon, Evert A. Bouman, Anders Arvesen, Sangwon Suh, Garvin A. Heath, Joseph D. Bergesen, Andrea Ramirez, Mabel I. Vega, Lei Shi, Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 112, pp. 6277- 6282 ,(2015) , 10.1073/PNAS.1312753111
Karin Treyer, Christian Bauer, Life cycle inventories of electricity generation and power supply in version 3 of the ecoinvent database—part I: electricity generation International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 21, pp. 1236- 1254 ,(2016) , 10.1007/S11367-013-0665-2