Prevention of nickel release with barrier coatings.
作者： Angela M. Sprigle , James G. Marks , Bryan E. Anderson
关键词:
摘要: BACKGROUND Allergic contact dermatitis from nickel is very common in the United States. A barrier coating to be used on personal items such as snaps or watches would of great use preventing consequences allergy. OBJECTIVE To evaluate various coatings and their ability yield a negative dimethylglyoxime (DMG) test result. METHODS Four different were assessed prior soaking saline, after saline for 2 days, 7 days. RESULTS Depending number time soaked barriers showed efficacies yielding DMG CONCLUSIONS Nickel Guard Beauty Secrets Hardener most effective was more cost-effective choice.
elsevier.com
sci-hub.st 参考文章(10)
Torkel Fischer, Sigfrid Fregert, Birgitta Gruvberger, Ingela Rystedt, Nickel release from ear piercing kits and earrings Contact Dermatitis. ,vol. 10, pp. 39- 41 ,(1984) , 10.1111/J.1600-0536.1984.TB00059.X
Melanie D. Pratt, Donald V. Belsito, Vincent A. DeLeo, Joseph F. Fowler, Anthony F. Fransway, Howard I. Maibach, James G. Marks, Toby C.G. Mathias, Robert L. Rietschel, Denis Sasseville, Elizabeth F. Sherertz, Frances J. Storrs, James S. Taylor, Kathryn Zug, North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results, 2001-2002 study period Dermatitis. ,vol. 15, pp. 176- 183 ,(2004) , 10.1097/01206501-200412000-00003
John C. Moseley, Polyurethane Coating in the Prevention of Nickel Dermatitis Archives of Dermatology. ,vol. 103, pp. 58- 60 ,(1971) , 10.1001/ARCHDERM.1971.04000130060008
Edward A. Emmett, Terence H. Risby, Long Jiang, See Ket Ng, Susan Feinman, Allergic contact dermatitis to nickel: Bioavailability from consumer products and provocation threshold Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. ,vol. 19, pp. 314- 322 ,(1988) , 10.1016/S0190-9622(88)70178-4
Niels K. Veien, Thais Hattel, Grete Laurberg, Reduced nickel sensitivity in young Danish women following regulation of nickel exposure. Contact Dermatitis. ,vol. 45, pp. 104- 106 ,(2001) , 10.1034/J.1600-0536.2001.045002104.X
David A. Basketter, Gianni Angelini, Arieh Ingber, Petra S. Kern, Torkil Menné, Nickel, chromium and cobalt in consumer products: revisiting safe levels in the new millennium Contact Dermatitis. ,vol. 49, pp. 1- 7 ,(2003) , 10.1111/J.0105-1873.2003.00149.X
S. D. Prystowsky, Allergic contact hypersensitivity to nickel, neomycin, ethylenediamine, and benzocaine. Relationships between age, sex, history of exposure, and reactivity to standard patch tests and use tests in a general population Archives of Dermatology. ,vol. 115, pp. 959- 962 ,(1979) , 10.1001/ARCHDERM.115.8.959
David J. Gawkrodger, Nickel dermatitis: how much nickel is safe? Contact Dermatitis. ,vol. 35, pp. 267- 271 ,(1996) , 10.1111/J.1600-0536.1996.TB02386.X
J.duus Johansen, T. Menné, J. Christophersen, K. Kaaber, N. Veien, Changes in the pattern of sensitization to common contact allergens in Denmark between 1985-86 and 1997-98, with a special view to the effect of preventive strategies British Journal of Dermatology. ,vol. 142, pp. 490- 495 ,(2000) , 10.1046/J.1365-2133.2000.03362.X
J. G. Marks, North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch-Test Results, 1996-1998 Archives of Dermatology. ,vol. 136, pp. 272- 273 ,(2000) , 10.1001/ARCHDERM.136.2.272