Farmer rationality and the adoption of environmentally sound practices; A critique of the assumptions of traditional agricultural extension

作者: F. Vanclay , G. Lawrence

DOI: 10.1080/13892249485300061

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Traditional extension has been a top down process: scientists developed products and methods which, following promulgation by agencies, farmers were expected to adopt. Extension agents considered who failed adopt new techniques be recalcitrant irrational. Farmers' attitudes their lack of knowledge the main barriers adoption. Little consideration was given farmers' points view. The idea that resistance or reluctance change might have some logical basis never considered. Recent analysis reveals most ‘barriers’ rational can categorised as: conflicting information; risk; implementation costs capital outlay; intellectual loss flexibility; complexity; incompatibility with other aspects farm management personal objectives. Social perceptional issues also affect This paper examines conceptual concerns about efficacy traditional practices ...

参考文章(41)
Terry Marsden, Sarah Whatmore, Philip Lowe, Technological change and the rural environment Fulton. ,(1990)
N.G. Röling, Facilitating sustainable agriculture: turning policy models upside down. In: Beyond farmers first: Rural people's knowledge, agricultural research and extension practice, I. Scoones, J. Thompson (eds.). Intermed. Technol. Publ., London (1994) 245-248.. ,(1994)
Paul G. H. Engel, Niels G. Röling, Information technology from a knowledge system perspective: Concepts and issues Knowledge, Technology & Policy. ,vol. 3, pp. 6- 18 ,(1990) , 10.1007/BF02824945
Arnold Pacey, Robert Chambers, Lori Ann Thrupp, Farmer First: Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research ,(1989)
Fred Pampel, J. C. van Es, Environmental Quality and Issues of Adoption Research. Rural Sociology. ,(1977)
David L. Taylor, William L. Miller, The adoption process and environmental innovations: a case study of a government project. Rural Sociology. ,vol. 43, pp. 634- 648 ,(1978)