Patient safety in the office-based setting

作者: J Bauer Horton , Edward M. Reece , George Broughton , Jeffrey E. Janis , James F. Thornton

DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000204796.65812.68

关键词:

摘要: Learning Objectives: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Discern importance of physician’s office administrative capacity. 2. Recognize necessity a system for quality assessment. 3. Assess which procedures are safe in office-based setting. 4. Know basic steps to properly evaluate patients plastic surgery. Background: At least 44,000 Americans die annually as result preventable medical errors. Medical mistakes eighth leading cause death United States, costing between $54.6 billion and $79 billion, or 6 percent total annual national health care expenditures. Office-based comprise 10-fold increase risk serious injury compared with an ambulatory surgical facility. Methods: This article reviews literature on patient safety issues. It places special emphasis statements advisories published by American Society Plastic Surgeons’ convened Task Force Patient Safety Office-Based Settings. stresses areas increased concern, such deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis liposuction Results: The divides delivery into three broad categories. First, starts at level. physician independent governing body must develop assessment that functions minimize errors report outcomes Second, clinical aspects require whether procedure(s) proper Finally, gives attention liposuction, most frequently performed surgery procedure. Conclusions: every highest priority, reflected Hippocratic Oath: primum non nocere (“first, do no harm”). In setting, priority requires both emphasis. who healing touch always have foremost priority.

参考文章(32)
Joanne Fortier, Frances Chung, Jun Su, Unanticipated admission after ambulatory surgery — a prospective study Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia-journal Canadien D Anesthesie. ,vol. 45, pp. 612- 619 ,(1998) , 10.1007/BF03012088
Rod J. Rohrich, Jeffrey M. Kenkel, Jeffrey E. Janis, Samuel J. Beran, Peter B. Fodor, An update on the role of subcutaneous infiltration in suction-assisted lipoplasty. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. ,vol. 111, pp. 926- 927 ,(2003) , 10.1097/01.PRS.0000039396.69495.C5
Mark D. Gilliland, Nancy Coates, Tumescent liposuction complicated by pulmonary edema. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. ,vol. 99, pp. 215- 219 ,(1997) , 10.1097/00006534-199701000-00032
Melinda L. Mingus, Carol A. Bodian, Colette N. Bradford, James B. Eisenkraft, Prolonged surgery increases the likelihood of admission of scheduled ambulatory surgery patients Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. ,vol. 9, pp. 446- 450 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0952-8180(97)00098-6
John F. Reinisch, Stephen D. Bresnick, John W. T. Walker, Ronald F. Rosso, Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolus after face lift: a study of incidence and prophylaxis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. ,vol. 107, pp. 1570- 1575 ,(2001) , 10.1097/00006534-200105000-00044
Lucian L. Leape, Troyen A. Brennan, Nan Laird, Ann G. Lawthers, A. Russell Localio, Benjamin A. Barnes, Liesi Hebert, Joseph P. Newhouse, Paul C. Weiler, Howard Hiatt, The Nature of Adverse Events in Hospitalized Patients New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 324, pp. 377- 384 ,(1991) , 10.1056/NEJM199102073240605
Rod J. Rohrich, The increasing popularity of cosmetic surgery procedures: a look at statistics in plastic surgery. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. ,vol. 106, pp. 1363- 1365 ,(2000) , 10.1097/00006534-200011000-00023
Peter J. Rubin, Clifford Bierman, Carl E. Rosow, Richard G. Arthur, YuChiao Chang, Eugene H. Courtiss, James W. May, The tumescent technique: the effect of high tissue pressure and dilute epinephrine on absorption of lidocaine. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. ,vol. 103, pp. 990- 996 ,(1999) , 10.1097/00006534-199903000-00036
Rod J. Rohrich, Paul F. White, Safety of Outpatient Surgery: Is Mandatory Accreditation of Outpatient Surgery Centers Enough? Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. ,vol. 107, pp. 189- 192 ,(2001) , 10.1097/00006534-200101000-00031