Sample size calculations for comparative studies of medical tests for detecting presence of disease.

作者: Todd A. Alonzo , Margaret S. Pepe , Chaya S. Moskowitz

DOI: 10.1002/SIM.1058

关键词:

摘要: Technologic advances give rise to new tests for detecting disease in many fields, including cancer and sexually transmitted disease. Before a screening test is approved public use, its accuracy should be shown better than or at least not inferior an existing test. Standards do yet exist designing analysing studies address this issue. Established principles the design of therapeutic can adapted tests. In particular, drawing upon methods superiority non-inferiority agents, we propose that confidence intervals relative dichotomous drive comparative We derive sample size formulae variety designs, where patients undergo several receive only one under evaluation. Both cohort case-control study designs are considered. Modifications discussed accommodate where, because invasive nature definitive testing, true status obtained subjects who positive on more The proposed applied comparing modified pap conventional cervical screening. impact error gold standard reference evaluation also discussed.

参考文章(35)
Hanley Ja, Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology: the state of the art. Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging. ,vol. 29, pp. 307- 335 ,(1989)
Philip Cole, Alan S Morrison, Basic Issues in Population Screening for Cancer Journal of the National Cancer Institute. ,vol. 64, pp. 1263- 1272 ,(1980) , 10.1093/JNCI/64.5.1263
Stuart G. Baker, Robert J. Connor, Larry G. Kessler, The partial testing design : A less costly way to test equivalence for sensitivity and specificity Statistics in Medicine. ,vol. 17, pp. 2219- 2232 ,(1998) , 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2219::AID-SIM919>3.0.CO;2-1
Jeroen G Lijmer, Ben Willem Mol, Siem Heisterkamp, Gouke J Bonsel, Martin H Prins, Jan HP Van Der Meulen, Patrick MM Bossuyt, Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests JAMA. ,vol. 282, pp. 1061- 1066 ,(1999) , 10.1001/JAMA.282.11.1061
John E. Connett, Judith A. Smith, Richard B. McHugh, Sample size and power for pair‐matched case‐control studies Statistics in Medicine. ,vol. 6, pp. 53- 59 ,(1987) , 10.1002/SIM.4780060107
Steven D Walter, Les M Irwig, Estimation of test error rates, disease prevalence and relative risk from misclassified data: a review Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 41, pp. 923- 937 ,(1988) , 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90110-2
Robert J. Connor, Sample Size for Testing Differences in Proportions for the Paired-Sample Design Biometrics. ,vol. 43, pp. 207- 211 ,(1987) , 10.2307/2531961