Discourse analysis: bridging frameworks or cultivating practices?
作者： Karen Tracy
DOI: 10.1080/17447143.2016.1226317
关键词:
摘要: ABSTRACTThis essay responds to Gee’s article in which he proposes that discourse analysis is an approach can bridge frames. I begin by elaborating a difference academic cultures among scholars who identify as analysts. argue cultural grounding built into and study of communication more generally. The concludes offering the idea cultivating practices alternative bridging frameworks.
sci-hub.se 参考文章(24)
Edward Schiappa, Defining Reality: Definitions and the Politics of Meaning ,(2003)
Diana Carole Mutz, Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy ,(2002)
Herbert H. Clark, Using language: Index of names ,(1996) , 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
Herbert H. Clark, Using language: Communicative acts ,(1996) , 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
James Gee, The routledge handbook of discourse analysis Published in <b>2014</b> in London New York by Routledge. ,(2011) , 10.4324/9780203809068
Todd L. Sandel, Cornelia Ilie, Karen Tracy, The International Encyclopedia of language and social interaction Wiley-Blackwell. ,(2015)
Angela Cora Garcia, Lisa M. Fisher, Conversation and Gender: Being there for the children: The collaborative construction of gender inequality in divorce mediation ,(2011) , 10.1017/CBO9780511781032.014
Robert T. Craig, Karen Tracy, Building Grounded Practical Theory in Applied Communication Research: Introduction to the Special Issue Journal of Applied Communication Research. ,vol. 42, pp. 229- 243 ,(2014) , 10.1080/00909882.2014.916410
Penelope Eckert, Sally McConnell-Ginet, Think Practically and Look Locally: Language and Gender as Community-Based Practice Annual Review of Anthropology. ,vol. 21, pp. 461- 488 ,(1992) , 10.1146/ANNUREV.AN.21.100192.002333
Robert T. Craig, Karen Tracy, Grounded Practical Theory: The Case of Intellectual Discussion Communication Theory. ,vol. 5, pp. 248- 272 ,(1995) , 10.1111/J.1468-2885.1995.TB00108.X