Minimally Invasive Kidney Transplantation: The First Experience

作者: P. Pfeffer , O. Øyen , T. Scholz , A. Hartmann

DOI: 10.1016/J.TRANSPROCEED.2006.08.102

关键词:

摘要: Minimally invasive procedures in recent years have gained widespread acceptance. Within the field of transplantation, laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LLDN), requiring a 6- to 10-cm incision, is now considered optimal procedure. According MEDLINE searches, no minimally technique has been reported for kidney transplantation. Considering rapid evolution surgery during last decade, there little reason believe that transplantation future will be excluded from this development. A novel (MIKT) presented, restricted 7- 9-cm incision and minimal dissection/tissue trauma. The meticulously prepared on back table placed fitted lateral, retroperitoneal pouch. All three anastomoses are performed with its final "in situ" position, ureter reimplantation done by extravesical technique. Twenty-one patients transplanted MIKT followed prospective manner, along matched control group subjected conventional Our results indicate may executed safely quickly. Beneficial effects postoperative pain/analgesia, recovery, complications suggested first experience. technical solutions per se not unique. However, larger than one required LLDN. seems particularly attractive immunosuppressed population, even more so introduction potent antiproliferative drugs.

参考文章(11)
Patrick G. Dean, William J. Lund, Timothy S. Larson, Mikel Prieto, Scott L. Nyberg, Michael B. Ishitani, Walter K. Kremers, Mark D. Stegall, Wound-healing complications after kidney transplantation: a prospective, randomized comparison of sirolimus and tacrolimus. Transplantation. ,vol. 77, pp. 1555- 1561 ,(2004) , 10.1097/01.TP.0000123082.31092.53
R Krol, L Cierpka, J Ziaja, J Pawlicki, G Budzinski, Surgically treated early complications after kidney transplantation Congress of the Polish Transplantation Society. ,vol. 35, pp. 2241- 2242 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0041-1345(03)00769-3
Andrew G. Harrell, B. Todd Heniford, Minimally invasive abdominal surgery: lux et veritas past, present, and future. American Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 190, pp. 239- 243 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.AMJSURG.2005.05.019
Ole ??yen, Marit Andersen, Lars Mathisen, Gunnvald Kvarstein, Bj??rn Edwin, P??l-Dag Line, Tim Scholz, Per F. Pfeffer, Laparoscopic versus open living-donor nephrectomy: experiences from a prospective, randomized, single-center study focusing on donor safety Transplantation. ,vol. 79, pp. 1236- 1240 ,(2005) , 10.1097/01.TP.0000161669.49416.BA
H Masahiko, T Kazunari, T Tokumoto, N Ishikawa, T Yagisawa, H Toma, Comparative study of urosurgical complications in renal transplantation : Intravesical versus extravesical ureterocystoneostomy Congress of the Asian Society of Transplantation. ,vol. 32, pp. 1844- 1846 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0041-1345(00)01458-5
Øystein Bentdal, Bo Husberg, Pål-Dag Line, Aksel Foss, Ole Øyen, Bjørn Edwin, Per Pfeffer, Inge Brekke, Vikas Siwach, Bjørn Lien, Improvement of post-transplant lymphocele treatment in the laparoscopic era. Transplant International. ,vol. 15, pp. 406- 410 ,(2002) , 10.1007/S00147-002-0437-6
RALPH V. CLAYMAN, SAMUEL S. K. SO, MARTIN D. JENDRISAK, DOUGLAS W. HANTO, Laparoscopic drainage of a posttransplant lymphocele. Transplantation. ,vol. 51, pp. 725- 727 ,(1991) , 10.1097/00007890-199103000-00034
J.Stuart Wolf, Marie-Blanche Tchetgen, Robert M Merion, Hand-assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy Urology. ,vol. 52, pp. 885- 887 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00389-6
Taner Koçak, Ismet Nane, Haluk Ander, Orhan Ziylan, Tayfun Oktar, Cavit Ozsoy, Urological and surgical complications in 362 consecutive living related donor kidney transplantations. Urologia Internationalis. ,vol. 72, pp. 252- 256 ,(2004) , 10.1159/000077125