Breaking out of the echo chamber: missed opportunities for genetics at conservation conferences

作者: Helen R. Taylor , Kylie Soanes

DOI: 10.1007/S10531-016-1159-X

关键词:

摘要: Genetic approaches have proven useful for addressing various conservation problems, but genetics remains poorly integrated into practice. Multidisciplinary conferences present excellent opportunities bridging the conservation-genetics gap and facilitating cross-disciplinary projects. We hypothesize that there is a tendency presentations featuring genetic to be siloed approach specific sessions, creating an “echo chamber”; geneticists are left talking amongst themselves, hindering collaboration across disciplines. To test this, we reviewed abstracts from past six Society Conservation Biology assessed how genetics/genomics were distributed throughout respective programs. found that: segregation of varied widely between (22–78 %); no other method or was segregated same degree; vast majority (99 %) had broader applications made them appropriate sessions. argue segregating at in this way unhelpful serves strengthen idea not relevant wider audience. recommend that; (1) conference organisers endeavour facilitate integration sessions based on questions addressed, rather than methods used address them; (2) make practical application their work clear abstract submission during presentations. These recommendations novel, our data illustrate need implemented better research will benefit outcomes.

参考文章(21)
Ryan P. Kelly, The Use of Population Genetics in Endangered Species Act Listing Decisions Ecology Law Quarterly. ,vol. 37, pp. 1107- ,(2010) , 10.15779/Z38255P
Frederick William Allendorf, Gordon Luikart, Conservation and the genetics of populations ,(2006)
Jennifer C. Pierson, Steven R. Beissinger, Jason G. Bragg, David J. Coates, J. Gerard B. Oostermeijer, Paul Sunnucks, Nathan H. Schumaker, Meredith V. Trotter, Andrew G. Young, Incorporating evolutionary processes into population viability models. Conservation Biology. ,vol. 29, pp. 755- 764 ,(2015) , 10.1111/COBI.12431
Susan M. Haig, Mark. P. Miller, Renee Bellinger, Hope M. Draheim, Dacey M. Mercer, Thomas D. Mullins, The conservation genetics juggling act: integrating genetics and ecology, science and policy Evolutionary Applications. ,vol. 9, pp. 181- 195 ,(2016) , 10.1111/EVA.12337
SYLVIA M. FALLON, Genetic Data and the Listing of Species Under the U.S. Endangered Species Act Conservation Biology. ,vol. 21, pp. 1186- 1195 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2007.00775.X
Fred W Allendorf, Paul A Hohenlohe, Gordon Luikart, None, Genomics and the future of conservation genetics Nature Reviews Genetics. ,vol. 11, pp. 697- 709 ,(2010) , 10.1038/NRG2844
Richard Frankham, Challenges and opportunities of genetic approaches to biological conservation. Biological Conservation. ,vol. 143, pp. 1919- 1927 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2010.05.011
Jianguo Liu, Harold Mooney, Vanessa Hull, Steven J. Davis, Joanne Gaskell, Thomas Hertel, Jane Lubchenco, Karen C. Seto, Peter Gleick, Claire Kremen, Shuxin Li, Systems integration for global sustainability Science. ,vol. 347, pp. 1258832- ,(2015) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1258832
Sean Hoban, Jan W Arntzen, Giorgio Bertorelle, Josef Bryja, Margarida Fernandes, Katie Frith, Oscar Gaggiotti, Peter Galbusera, José A Godoy, Heidi C Hauffe, A Rus Hoelzel, Richard A Nichols, Sílvia Pérez-Espona, Craig Primmer, Isa-Rita M Russo, Gernot Segelbacher, Hans R Siegismund, Marjatta Sihvonen, Per Sjögren-Gulve, Cristiano Vernesi, Carles Vilà, Michael W Bruford, None, Conservation Genetic Resources for Effective Species Survival (ConGRESS): Bridging the divide between conservation research and practice Journal for Nature Conservation. ,vol. 21, pp. 433- 437 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.JNC.2013.07.005