II-Some Persistent Presumptions of Hegelian Anti-Subjectivism

作者: Karl Ameriks

DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-8349.2015.00243.X

关键词:

摘要: Like many other recent Hegelian accounts, Stephen Houlgate's severe critique of Kant's theoretical philosophy contends that, in contrast to Hegel, Critical system, especially because its doctrine transcendental idealism, presupposes a subjectivist and therefore inadequate position. On the basis moderate interpretation idealism his general procedure, I defend Kant from charge subjectivism, also give an account how interpretations can arise series understandable misunderstandings difficult passages first Critique.

参考文章(20)
Karl Ameriks, Kant and the Fate of Autonomy Published in <b>2000</b> in Cambridge by Cambridge university press. ,(2000) , 10.1017/CBO9781139173346
Karl Ameriks, Kant's Elliptical Path ,(2012)
Karl Ameriks, Interpreting Kant's Critiques ,(2003)
Stephen Houlgate, I-Hegel's Critique of Kant Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. ,vol. 89, pp. 21- 41 ,(2015) , 10.1111/J.1467-8349.2015.00242.X
Lucy Allais, Kant, Non-Conceptual Content and the Representation of Space Journal of the History of Philosophy. ,vol. 47, pp. 383- 413 ,(2009) , 10.1353/HPH.0.0134
Immanuel Kant, CRITIQUE of PRACTICAL REASON ,(1976)
Karl Ameriks, Kant, Fichte, and Short Arguments to Idealism Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. ,vol. 72, pp. 63- 85 ,(1990) , 10.1515/AGPH.1990.72.1.63