Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews.

作者: Allen I. Huffcutt , James M. Conway , Philip L. Roth , Nancy J. Stone

DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.897

关键词:

摘要: There has been a growing interest in understanding what constructs are assessed the employment interview and properties of those assessments. To address these issues, authors developed comprehensive taxonomy 7 types that could assess. Analysis 338 ratings from 47 actual studies indicated basic personality applied social skills were most frequently rated this taxonomy, followed by mental capability job knowledge skills. Further analysis suggested high- low-structure interviews tend to focus on different constructs. Taking both frequency validity results into consideration, findings suggest at least part reason why structured have higher is because they more stronger relationship with performance. Limitations directions for future research discussed.

参考文章(90)
Ursula Ruth Walsh, A TEST OF THE CONSTRUCT AND PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF A STRUCTURED INTERVIEW. ProQuest Information & Learning. ,(1975)
James M. Conway, Gina M. Peneno, Comparing Structured Interview Question Types: Construct Validity and Applicant Reactions Journal of Business and Psychology. ,vol. 13, pp. 485- 506 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1022914803347
Robert W. Eder, Michael M. Harris, The Employment Interview Handbook ,(1999)
Charles O. Davidshofer, Kevin R. Murphy, Psychological Testing: Principles and Applications ,(1988)
Daniel G. Bobrow, Allan Collins, Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science Academic Press, Inc.. ,(1975)
Terry Winograd, FRAME REPRESENTATIONS AND THE DECLARATIVE/PROCEDURAL CONTROVERSY Representation and Understanding#R##N#Studies in Cognitive Science. pp. 185- 210 ,(1975) , 10.1016/B978-0-12-108550-6.50012-4