Efficiency of research performance and the glass researcher

作者: Lutz Bornmann , Robin Haunschild

DOI: 10.1016/J.JOI.2015.11.009

关键词:

摘要: Abramo and D'Angelo (in press) doubt the validity of established size-independent indicators measuring citation impact plead in favor scientific efficiency (by using Fractional Scientific Strength indicator). This note is intended to comment on some questionable a few favorable approaches paper by press).

参考文章(15)
Henk F Moed, Gali Halevi, None, Multidimensional assessment of scholarly research impact Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. ,vol. 66, pp. 1988- 2002 ,(2015) , 10.1002/ASI.23314
Robin Haunschild, Lutz Bornmann, Criteria for Nature Index questioned Nature. ,vol. 517, pp. 21- 21 ,(2015) , 10.1038/517021D
J. E. Hirsch, Does the H index have predictive power Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 104, pp. 19193- 19198 ,(2007) , 10.1073/PNAS.0707962104
Henry Small, Michel Zitt, Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. ,vol. 59, pp. 1856- 1860 ,(2008) , 10.1002/ASI.V59:11
Werner Marx, Lutz Bornmann, On the causes of subject-specific citation rates in Web of Science Scientometrics. ,vol. 102, pp. 1823- 1827 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S11192-014-1499-9
Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo, How do you define and measure research productivity? Scientometrics. ,vol. 101, pp. 1129- 1144 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S11192-014-1269-8
Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. ,vol. 59, pp. 830- 837 ,(2008) , 10.1002/ASI.V59:5