Respective potencies of Botox and Dysport: a double blind, randomised, crossover study in cervical dystonia.

作者: J L Mas , D Ranoux , C Gury , J Fondarai , M Zuber

DOI: 10.1136/JNNP.72.4.459

关键词:

摘要: Objectives: Botulinum toxin type A is a potent neuromuscular paralyzing agent used in various disorders including cervical dystonia. Two preparations of botulinum are now commercially available ( Dysport and Botox), but much controversy remains about their respective potencies. The aim the study was to compare efficacy Botox with two different ratios Dysport. Methods: double blind, randomised, three period cross over involving 54 patients dystonia performed. received following treatments randomised order: at usually effective dose, dose 1:3 (conversion factor 3 between units—that is, one unit=three units) 1:4 four). improvement Tsui (primary outcome criteria) TWSTRS pain scales baseline control visit 1 month after each injections, as well incidence adverse events, were assessed. Results: Comparison scores showed better effect on impairment (p=0.02 0.04, respectively) (p=0.01 0.02, than Botox. number events higher both treatments. most frequent event dysphagia, found 3%, 15.6%, 17.3% (Botox, 1:4, patients. No required withdrawal therapy or specific management. Conclusions: (and greater extent) more efficient for although somewhat minor effects. This strongly suggests that appropriate conversion units less

参考文章(14)
McCormack Mp, Medico-legal reports. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. ,vol. 86, pp. 493- 493 ,(1993)
Cristina Sampaio, Joaquim J. Ferreira, Fernanda Simões, Maria J. Rosas, Marina Magalhães, Ana P. Correia, António Bastos-Lima, Rairnundo Martins, Alexandre Castro-Caldas, DYSBOT: A single‐blind, randomized parallel study to determine whether any differences can be detected in the efficacy and tolerability of two formulations of botulinum toxin type A—Dysport and Botox—assuming a ratio of 4:1 Movement Disorders. ,vol. 12, pp. 1013- 1018 ,(1997) , 10.1002/MDS.870120627
Gary E. Borodic, L. Bruce Pearce, Karen Smith, Michael Joseph, Botulinum a toxin for spasmodic torticollis: multiple vs single injection points per muscle. Head and Neck-journal for The Sciences and Specialties of The Head and Neck. ,vol. 14, pp. 33- 37 ,(1992) , 10.1002/HED.2880140108
John A. Oates, Alastair J.J. Wood, Joseph Jankovic, Mitchell F. Brin, Therapeutic Uses of Botulinum Toxin New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 324, pp. 1186- 1194 ,(1991) , 10.1056/NEJM199104253241707
M H Marion, M Sheehy, S Sangla, S Soulayrol, Dose standardisation of botulinum toxin. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. ,vol. 59, pp. 102- 103 ,(1995) , 10.1136/JNNP.59.1.102
R. Eleopra, V. Tugnoli, D. de Grandis, The variability in the clinical effect induced by botulinum toxin type A: The role of muscle activity in humans Movement Disorders. ,vol. 12, pp. 89- 94 ,(1997) , 10.1002/MDS.870120115
Gary Borodic, Therapeutic botulinum toxin The Lancet. ,vol. 344, pp. 1370- 1370 ,(1994) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)90732-3
D. J. Gelb, D. H. Lowenstein, M. J. Aminoff, Controlled trial of botulinum toxin injections in the treatment of spasmodic torticollis Neurology. ,vol. 39, pp. 80- 80 ,(1989) , 10.1212/WNL.39.1.80
K. Wohlfarth, Hilke Göschel, Jürgen Frevert, Reinhard Dengler, H. Bigalke, Botulinum A toxins: units versus units Naunyn-schmiedebergs Archives of Pharmacology. ,vol. 355, pp. 335- 340 ,(1997) , 10.1007/PL00004951