Politicizing Brandom's Pragmatism: Normativity and the Agonal Character of Social Practice

作者: Thomas Fossen

DOI: 10.1111/J.1468-0378.2011.00504.X

关键词:

摘要: This paper provides an agonistic interpretation of Robert Brandom's social-pragmatic account normativity. I argue that social practice, on this approach, should be seen not just as cooperative, but also contestatory. aspect, which has so far remained implicit, helps to illuminate claim normative statuses are ‘instituted’ by practices: brought into play in mutual engagement, and only from engaged perspective among others. Moreover, contrast a positivist or conventionalist understanding work, it shows the possibility critical stance toward existing practices is compatible with, already implicit form pragmatism. can made explicit with notion farcical treated merely if they institute genuine commitments entitlements. Interpreting practice taking it, inherent theoretical framework. opens way for fruitful appropriation pragmatism political philosophy.

参考文章(47)
Friedrich Nietzsche, Carol Diethe, Keith Ansell-Pearson, Homer's Contest ,(1872)
H. Heath White, Mark Lance, Stereoscopic Vision: Persons, Freedom, and Two Spaces of Material Inference Philosopher's Imprint. ,vol. 7, ,(2007)
Linda M. G. Zerilli, Feminism and the abyss of freedom ,(2005)
Robert B. Brandom, Reason in Philosophy: Animating Ideas ,(2009)
T. Fossen, Political legitimacy and the pragmatic turn Zeno Institute for Philosophy. ,(2011)
The Cambridge companion to Foucault Published in <b>2006</b> in Cambridge by Cambridge university press. ,(1994) , 10.1017/CCOL9780521403320