Femoral neck shape and the spatial distribution of its mineral mass varies with its size: Clinical and biomechanical implications

作者: Roger M.D. Zebaze , Anthony Jones , Findlay Welsh , Mark Knackstedt , Ego Seeman

DOI: 10.1016/J.BONE.2005.03.019

关键词:

摘要: The femoral neck (FN) is a cantilever with external and internal dimensions determining its size, shape, the spatial distribution of mineralized cortical trabecular bone tissue mass, strength. Geometric indices FN strength are often derived using estimated in vivo from dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) assuming that cross section approximates circle or square. As DXA does not measure depth, we examined whether circular, square, elliptical models sections predict so volume, volumetric mineral density (vBMD), geometric We studied paired specimens 13 Caucasian female cadavers (mean age 69 years, range 29 to 85) DXA, micro-computed tomography (mu-CT), direct calliper measurements. accurately measured width (supero-inferior diameter) but circular square overestimated depth (antero-posterior underestimated vBMD by 15.0 +/- 5.8% (circular section) 33.2 4.6% (square (both P < 0.05). was less than width, an model constant depth/width ratio 0.75 reduced accuracy error 14.0 8.5% (P = 0.10). However, as increased, increased relatively less. An quadratic equation mimic this changing shape increasing size 4.4 7.7% (NS). Circular cross-section modulus at mid-FN about 51%. two- three fold. Images micro-CT scanning show cross-sectional resembles ellipse long axis maximum moment inertia (I(max)) oriented supero-inferior direction, mass concentrated inferiorly. larger section, more greater I(max) supero-inferiorly, while I(min) (in antero-posterior direction) remains constant. bone, moments likely be adaptations bending during bipedalism. Assuming produces errors vBMD, Studies needed determine effects age, sex, race on health disease.

参考文章(32)
P. D. F. Murray, J. S. Huxley, Self-Differentiation in the Grafted Limb-Bud of the Chick. Journal of Anatomy. ,vol. 59, pp. 379- 384 ,(1925)
George Sanger, Structure and Mechanics ,(1991)
Jacqueline A. Runestad, Christopher B. Ruff, James C. Nieh, Richard W. Thorington, Mark F. Teaford, Radiographic estimation of long bone cross-sectional geometric properties American Journal of Physical Anthropology. ,vol. 90, pp. 207- 213 ,(1993) , 10.1002/AJPA.1330900207
L. Joseph Melton, Elizabeth J. Atkinson, Michael K. O'Connor, W. Michael O'Fallon, B. Lawrence Riggs, Bone density and fracture risk in men. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. ,vol. 13, pp. 1915- 1923 ,(1998) , 10.1359/JBMR.1998.13.12.1915
X.G. Cheng, G. Lowet, S. Boonen, P.H.F. Nicholson, P. Brys, J. Nijs, J. Dequeker, Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: Relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry Bone. ,vol. 20, pp. 213- 218 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S8756-3282(96)00383-3
Yunbo Duan, Thomas J Beck, Xiao-Fang Wang, Ego Seeman, Structural and biomechanical basis of sexual dimorphism in femoral neck fragility has its origins in growth and aging. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. ,vol. 18, pp. 1766- 1774 ,(2003) , 10.1359/JBMR.2003.18.10.1766
Dorothy A Nelson, John M Pettifor, David A Barondess, Dianna D Cody, Kirsti Uusi-Rasi, Thomas J Beck, Comparison of cross-sectional geometry of the proximal femur in white and black women from Detroit and Johannesburg Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. ,vol. 19, pp. 560- 565 ,(2004) , 10.1359/JBMR.040104
K. Strømsøe, A. Høiseth, A. Alho, W.L. Kok, Bending strength of the femur in relation to non-invasive bone mineral assessment. Journal of Biomechanics. ,vol. 28, pp. 857- 861 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0021-9290(95)95274-9