Influence of substratum surface chemistry/energy and topography on the human fetal osteoblastic cell line hFOB 1.19: Phenotypic and genotypic responses observed in vitro ☆

作者: Xiaomei Liu , Jung Yul Lim , Henry J. Donahue , Ravi Dhurjati , Andrea M. Mastro

DOI: 10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2007.06.016

关键词:

摘要: Time-dependent phenotypic response of a model osteoblast cell line (hFOB 1.19, ATCC, and CRL-11372) to substrata with varying surface chemistry topography is reviewed within the context extant cell-adhesion theory. Cell-attachment proliferation kinetics are compared using morphology as leading indicator phenotype. Expression (alpha2, alpha3, alpha4, alpha5, alphav, beta1, beta3) integrins, vinculin, well secretion osteopontin (OP) type I collagen (Col I) supplement this visual assessment hFOB growth. It concluded that significant events-contact, attachment, spreading, proliferation-are similar on all surfaces, independent substratum chemistry/energy. However, sequence events significantly delayed attenuated hydrophobic (poorly water-wettable) surfaces exhibiting characteristically low-attachment efficiency long induction periods before cells engage in an exponential-growth phase. Results suggest 'time-cell-substratum-compatibility-superposition principle' at work wherein bioadhesive outcomes can be ultimately achieved types hydrophilicity, but time required arrive outcome increases decreasing cell-substratum-compatibility. Genomic proteomic tools offer unprecedented opportunity directly measure changes cellular machinery lead observed responses different materials. But for purpose measuring structure-property relationships guide biomaterial development, genomic/proteomic should applied early adhesion/spreading process have remodel cell-substratum interface, effectively erasing cause effect between cell-substratum-compatibility properties. IMPACT STATEMENT: This review quantifies among phenotype, chemistry/energy, topography, contact revealing most useful pursuit understanding adhesion if process.

参考文章(107)
J. P. Duguid, D. C. Old, Adhesive Properties of Enterobacteriaceae Springer Netherlands. pp. 185- 217 ,(1980) , 10.1007/978-94-009-5863-0_7
Donald F. Gerson, Interfacial Free Energies of Cells and Polymers in Aqueous Media Springer, Boston, MA. pp. 229- 240 ,(1983) , 10.1007/978-1-4615-7584-9_14
Leonard Weiss, The adhesion of cells. International Review of Cytology-a Survey of Cell Biology. ,vol. 9, pp. 187- 225 ,(1960) , 10.1016/S0074-7696(08)62747-3
Sylvia Furner, Dorothy P. Rice, Allan Praemer, Musculoskeletal Conditions in the United States ,(1992)
John L. Brash, Peter Wojciechowski, Interfacial phenomena and bioproducts Marcel Dekker. ,(1996)
William G. Thilly, Mammalian cell technology Butterworths. ,(1986)
E. Zerhouni, Medicine. The NIH Roadmap. Science. ,vol. 302, pp. 63- 72 ,(2003) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1091867
Paul F. Kruse, Manford K. Patterson, Tissue culture. Methods and applications. Academic Press. ,(1973)
M. J. Dalby, L. Di Silvio, E. J. Harper, W. Bonfield, In vitro adhesion and biocompatability of osteoblast-like cells to poly(methylmethacrylate) and poly(ethylmethacrylate) bone cements. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. ,vol. 13, pp. 311- 314 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1014071120078
Marco Morra, Water in biomaterials surface science Water in Biomaterials Surface Science. pp. 408- ,(2001)