Analysis of Ensemble Mean Forecasts: The Blessings of High Dimensionality

作者: Bo Christiansen

DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-18-0211.1

关键词:

摘要: In weather and climate sciences ensemble forecasts have become an acknowledged community standard. It is often found that the ensemble mean not only has a low error relative to the typical error of the ensemble members but also that it outperforms all the individual ensemble members. We analyze ensemble simulations based on a simple statistical model that allows for bias and that has different variances for observations and the model ensemble. Using generic simplifying geometric properties of high-dimensional spaces we obtain analytical results for the error of the ensemble mean. These results include a closed form for the rank of the ensemble mean among the ensemble members and depend on two quantities: the ensemble variance and the bias both normalized with the variance of observations. The analytical results are used to analyze the GEFS reforecast where the variances and bias depend on lead time. For intermediate lead times between 20 and 100 h the two terms are both around 0.5 and the ensemble mean is only slightly better than individual ensemble members. For lead times larger than 240 h the variance term is close to 1 and the bias term is near 0.5. For these lead times the ensemble mean outperforms almost all individual ensemble members and its relative error comes close to −30%. These results are in excellent agreement with the theory. The simplifying properties of high-dimensional spaces can be applied not only to the ensemble mean but also to, for example, the ensemble spread.

参考文章(46)
Paul C. Kainen, Utilizing Geometric Anomalies of High Dimension: When Complexity Makes Computation Easier Computer Intensive Methods in Control and Signal Processing. pp. 283- 294 ,(1997) , 10.1007/978-1-4612-1996-5_18
Gregory Flato, Jochem Marotzke, Babatunde Abiodun, Pascale Braconnot, S Chan Chou, William Collins, Peter Cox, Fatima Driouech, Seita Emori, Veronika Eyring, Chris Forest, Peter Gleckler, Eric Guilyardi, Christian Jakob, Vladimir Kattsov, Chris Reason, M Rummukainen, Krishna AchutaRao, Alessandro Anav, Timothy Andrews, Johanna Baehr, Nathaniel L Bindoff, Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo, Jennifer Catto, Don Chambers, Ping Chang, Aiguo Dai, Clara Deser, Francisco Doblas-Reyes, Paul J Durack, Michael Eby, Ramon de Elia, Thierry Fichefet, Piers Forster, David Frame, John Fyfe, Emiola Gbobaniyi, Nathan Gillett, Fidel Jesus González-Rouco, Clare Goodess, Stephen Griffies, Alex Hall, Sandy Harrison, Andreas Hense, Elizabeth Hunke, Tatiana Ilyina, Detelina Ivanova, Gregory Johnson, Masa Kageyama, Viatcheslav Kharin, Stephen A Klein, Jeff Knight, Reto Knutti, Felix Landerer, Tong Lee, Hongmei Li, Natalie Mahowald, Carl Mears, Gerald Meehl, Colin Morice, Rym Msadek, Gunnar Myhre, J David Neelin, Jeff Painter, Tatiana Pavlova, Judith Perlwitz, Jean-Yves Peterschmitt, Jouni Räisänen, Florian Rauser, Jeffrey Reid, Mark Rodwell, Benjamin Santer, Adam A Scaife, Jörg Schulz, John Scinocca, David Sexton, Drew Shindell, Hideo Shiogama, Jana Sillmann, Adrian Simmons, Kenneth Sperber, David Stephenson, Bjorn Stevens, Peter Stott, Rowan Sutton, Peter W Thorne, Geert Jan van Oldenborgh, Gabriel Vecchi, Mark Webb, Keith Williams, Tim Woollings, Shang-Ping Xie, Jianglong Zhang, Evaluation of climate models Cambridge University Press. pp. 741- 866 ,(2013) , 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.020
J. Sillmann, V. V. Kharin, X. Zhang, F. W. Zwiers, D. Bronaugh, Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 1. Model evaluation in the present climate Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. ,vol. 118, pp. 1716- 1733 ,(2013) , 10.1002/JGRD.50203
Filip M. Mulier, Vladimir Cherkassky, Learning from Data: Concepts, Theory, and Methods John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. ,(1998)
Benjamin M. Sanderson, Reto Knutti, On the interpretation of constrained climate model ensembles Geophysical Research Letters. ,vol. 39, ,(2012) , 10.1029/2012GL052665
N. E. Bowler, M. J. P. Cullen, C. Piccolo, Verification against perturbed analyses and observations Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics. ,vol. 22, pp. 403- 411 ,(2015) , 10.5194/NPG-22-403-2015
V. Fortin, M. Abaza, F. Anctil, R. Turcotte, Why Should Ensemble Spread Match the RMSE of the Ensemble Mean Journal of Hydrometeorology. ,vol. 15, pp. 1708- 1713 ,(2014) , 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0008.1
Thomas M. Hamill, Gary T. Bates, Jeffrey S. Whitaker, Donald R. Murray, Michael Fiorino, Thomas J. Galarneau, Yuejian Zhu, William Lapenta, NOAA's Second-Generation Global Medium-Range Ensemble Reforecast Dataset Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. ,vol. 94, pp. 1553- 1565 ,(2013) , 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00014.1
Michel Talagrand, Concentration of measure and isoperimetric inequalities in product spaces Publications Mathématiques de l'IHÉS. ,vol. 81, pp. 73- 205 ,(1995) , 10.1007/BF02699376