Relationship between long durations and different regimens of hormone therapy and risk of breast cancer

作者: Christopher I Li , Kathleen E Malone , Peggy L Porter , Noel S Weiss , Mei-Tzu C Tang

DOI: 10.1001/JAMA.289.24.3254

关键词:

摘要: ContextWomen using combined estrogen and progestin hormone replacement therapy (CHRT) have an increased risk of breast cancer; however, data on use for long durations associated with patterns are lacking.ObjectiveTo evaluate relationships between durations CHRT use and cancer by histological type receptor status.DesignPopulation-based case-control study.SettingThree counties in western Washington State.ParticipantsNine hundred seventy-five women 65-79 years age diagnosed invasive breast from April 1, 1997, through May 31, 1999 (histology: 196 lobular cases, 656 ductal cases, 114 cases other type, 9 cases with unspecified type; (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) status: 646 ER+/PR+ 147 ER+/PR− 101 ER−/PR− [6 ER−/PR+ 75 unknown ER/PR status were not included the analyses herein]) 1007 population controls.Main Outcome MeasuresRisks invasive lobular, ductal, ER+/PR+, ER+/PR−, ER−/PR− breast carcinomas.ResultsWomen unopposed therapy (ERT) (exclusive ERT use), even 25 or longer, had no appreciable increase risk of cancer, although odds ratios inconsistent with a possible small effect. Ever users (includes who also used ERT) 1.7-fold (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-2.2) increased including 2.7-fold CI, 1.7-4.3) increased risk lobular carcinoma, 1.5-fold 1.1-2.0) 2.0-fold 1.5-2.7) cancers. The was greatest those using longer (users 5-14.9 ≥15 had 1.5-fold [95% 1.0-2.3] 1.6-fold 1.0-2.6] increases respectively, 3.7-fold 2.0-6.6] and 2.6-fold 1.3-5.3] carcinoma, respectively. Associations similar magnitudes seen among of both sequential continuous CHRT. Risks ER−/PR− tumors any form therapy; however, numbers these tumors limited power to detect associations.ConclusionThese suggest that is particularly tumors, whether progestin component taken manner.

参考文章(29)
R. I. Nicholson, J. F. R. Robertson, R. W. Blamey, I. O. Ellis, C. W. Elston, R. S. Du Toit, A. P. Locker, An evaluation of differences in prognosis, recurrence patterns and receptor status between invasive lobular and other invasive carcinomas of the breast. Ejso. ,vol. 17, pp. 251- 257 ,(1991)
Victoria Kirsh, Nancy Kreiger, Estrogen and estrogen-progestin replacement therapy and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in Canada. Cancer Causes & Control. ,vol. 13, pp. 583- 590 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1016330024268
Norman E. Breslow, N. E. Day, The analysis of case-control studies International Agency for Research on Cancer. ,(1980)
Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators, Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators, None, Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: Principal results from the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial JAMA. ,vol. 288, pp. 321- 333 ,(2002) , 10.1001/JAMA.288.3.321
Elyse E. Lower, Robbin Blau, Paula Gazder, Donna L. Stahl, The effect of estrogen usage on the subsequent hormone receptor status of primary breast cancer Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. ,vol. 58, pp. 205- 210 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1006315607241
Graham A. Colditz, Meir J. Stampfer, Walter C. Willett, David J. Hunter, JoAnn E. Manson, Charles H. Hennekens, Bernard A. Rosner, Frank E. Speizer, Type of postmenopausal hormone use and risk of breast cancer: 12-year follow-up from the Nurses' Health Study Cancer Causes & Control. ,vol. 3, pp. 433- 439 ,(1992) , 10.1007/BF00051356
Michael Stierer, Harald Rosen, Renate Weber, Hanns Hanak, Jürgen Spona, Heinz Tüchler, Immunohistochemical and biochemical measurement of estrogen and progesterone receptors in primary breast cancer. Correlation of histopathology and prognostic factors. Annals of Surgery. ,vol. 218, pp. 13- 21 ,(1993) , 10.1097/00000658-199307000-00004
Christopher I. Li, Noel S. Weiss, Janet L. Stanford, Janet R. Daling, Hormone replacement therapy in relation to risk of lobular and ductal breast carcinoma in middle-aged women. Cancer. ,vol. 88, pp. 2570- 2577 ,(2000) , 10.1002/1097-0142(20000601)88:11<2570::AID-CNCR20>3.0.CO;2-O
Karen K. Steinberg, S. Jay Smith, Stephen B. Thacker, Donna F. Stroup, Breast cancer risk and duration of estrogen use: the role of study design in meta-analysis. Epidemiology. ,vol. 5, pp. 415- 421 ,(1994) , 10.1097/00001648-199407000-00007
Chi-Ling Chen, Hormone Replacement Therapy in Relation to Breast Cancer JAMA. ,vol. 287, pp. 734- 741 ,(2002) , 10.1001/JAMA.287.6.734