作者: Carlos Ochoa Sangrador
DOI:
关键词:
摘要: participation of the students in a continued education course was evaluated. Methods: eight pediatric clinical scenes were selected, those that implied diagnostic and/or therapeutic decisions making, for evidence available did not allow to establish precise recommendations. Before de course, students received documentation each scene with case, a series questions, guide search and interpretation and some recent related articles. In answers the questions gathered, before after communications made by group experts. The suitability agreement of the respect experts� recommendations were analyzed. Results: From 126 students, data 105 initial 83 final questionnaires obtained. the answers between experts increased globally from the final surveys. If questions scene with an only recommended answer considered, this increase was from 56.2% (IC95%: 53.9 58.5) 76.3% (IC95%: 74 78.5). articles sent along clinical scenes influenced general little or nothing answers (medium 69.7%; rank 50 78.8%), except for 3, in which Spanish Clinical Practice Guideline half of answers. Nevertheless, opinion experts influenced much enough (medium 69.9%; rank 48.1 87.5%). Conclusions: pediatricians represented in the course show great variability, being some them inadequate. impact published scientific articles on decision making contrasts influence opinions. incorporation strategies active participation has quantifiable effect on our level knowledge capacity make decisions.