The role of civil society organisations in European responsible research and innovation

作者: Petra Ahrweiler , Nigel Gilbert , Benjamin Schrempf , Barbara Grimpe , Marina Jirotka

DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2018.1534508

关键词:

摘要: EC policy reveals a strong conviction that CSO’s main function in EU-funded research and innovation projects is to take care of the ‘societal perspective’, which would not be adequately represented otherwise. With this, CSOs are supposed advocates RRI project consortia supported by all kinds measures fulfil this role. This only problematic due definition problems concerning CSO as such. Empirical data about role high-tech/high-innovation distribution activities among members reveal much more multi-faceted (data providers, providers access field, specific domain expertise etc.) than currently assumed. Furthermore, policies have managed sensitise other actors societal perspective: universities companies likewise active promote realise perspectives with really standing out them. These findings at least two interesting implications: (1) far offer being just ‘moral voice’ society innovation; their contribution beneficial many respects. (2) The even successful expected: it one actor type introduce keys elements consortia; we can observe something like diffusion different types them supporting work.

参考文章(27)
Bridget M. Hutter, Joan O'Mahony, Business regulation: reviewing the regulatory potential of civil society organisations Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation, London School of Economics and Political Science. ,(2004)
Alex Haxeltine, Tom Hargreaves, Gill Seyfang, Noel Longhurst, Energy and communities in transition: Towards a new research agenda on agency and civil society in sustainability transitions Norwich: University of East Anglia, The Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE). ,(2010)
Richard Owen, Jack Stilgoe, Phil Macnaghten, Mike Gorman, Erik Fisher, Dave Guston, A Framework for Responsible Innovation In: Owen, RJ and Bessant, JR, (eds.) Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. (pp. 27-50). John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK. (2013). pp. 27- 50 ,(2013) , 10.1002/9781118551424.CH2
Ruth Mampuys, Frans W.A. Brom, Governance strategies for responding to alarming studies on the safety of GM crops Journal of Responsible Innovation. ,vol. 2, pp. 201- 219 ,(2015) , 10.1080/23299460.2015.1057797
Lotte Krabbenborg, Henk A. J. Mulder, Upstream Public Engagement in Nanotechnology : Constraints and Opportunities Science Communication. ,vol. 37, pp. 452- 484 ,(2015) , 10.1177/1075547015588601
Philipp Späth, Harald Rohracher, ‘Energy regions’: The transformative power of regional discourses on socio-technical futures Research Policy. ,vol. 39, pp. 449- 458 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.RESPOL.2010.01.017