作者: Ruth Mampuys , Frans W.A. Brom
DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2015.1057797
关键词:
摘要: Alarming studies about the safety of genetically modified organisms have been appearing since first (GM) crops were authorised for market release. The debates these a recurring pattern with similar players, arguments and strategies. More importantly, they are open-ended because those involved cannot agree on significance value or consequences that should be attached to them. roots disagreements lie deeper connect different views science, society, nature food production. Usually, governments respond in procedural manner by referring study their scientific advisory bodies. Thus far, conclude there is no reason revoke postpone GM authorisations. However, debate continues undiminished vigour. current response strategies alarming seem actually worsen status quo underlying not addressed. Starting from ...