Considering sampling approaches when determining carnivore diets: the importance of where, how, and when scats are collected

作者: Robin Steenweg , Michael P. Gillingham , Katherine L. Parker , Douglas C. Heard

DOI: 10.1007/S13364-015-0222-4

关键词:

摘要: Understanding the diets of carnivores is often required to inform their management, conserve prey, or minimize depredation domestic animals. Scat analysis one oldest and most commonly used methods for determining carnivore many accuracy issues associated with scat have been addressed in other studies. Little attention, however, has given questions where, how, when scats are sampled field how these factors can affect conclusions about diet. Based on a review 64 articles, two common sites collecting from grey wolves (Canis lupus) wolf homesites (i.e., dens rendezvous sites) along roads. Collections such areas combined interpreted as depictions seasonal diet, no acknowledgment inherent problems sampling at different sites. Rather than combining samples scat, we were interested comparing them. In our study, supported hypothesis that frequency prey types differs significantly between collected roads and, therefore, would tell stories summer diet if had only This difference likely due combination three interactions ecology design: local availability, timing deposition, movement behavior. especially interest considering findings review: descriptions design omitted, into single estimate opportunistically. Given results sampling, practices may data should be interpreted. Furthermore, using own idiosyncratic study an example, discuss assumptions literature, including assuming constant across packs years. To increase reliability estimates scats, researchers clearly articulate they chosen so potential biases inaccuracies assessed.

参考文章(85)
C. T. Darimont, M. H. H. Price, N. N. Winchester, J. Gordon-Walker, P. C. Paquet, Predators in natural fragments: foraging ecology of wolves in British Columbia's central and north coast archipelago Journal of Biogeography. ,vol. 31, pp. 1867- 1877 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1365-2699.2004.01141.X
John L. Weaver, Steven H. Fritts, Comparison of Coyote and Wolf Scat Diameters The Journal of Wildlife Management. ,vol. 43, pp. 786- 788 ,(1979) , 10.2307/3808765
Włodzimierz Jędrzejewski, Krzysztof Schmidt, Jörn Theuerkauf, Bogumiła Jędrzejewska, Nuria Selva, Karol Zub, Lucyna Szymura, KILL RATES AND PREDATION BY WOLVES ON UNGULATE POPULATIONS IN BIAŁOWIEŻA PRIMEVAL FOREST (POLAND) Ecology. ,vol. 83, pp. 1341- 1356 ,(2002) , 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1341:KRAPBW]2.0.CO;2
Elena S. Jones, Michael P. Gillingham, Dale R. Seip, Douglas C. Heard, Comparison of seasonal habitat selection between threatened woodland caribou ecotypes in central British Columbia Rangifer. ,vol. 27, pp. 111- 128 ,(2007) , 10.7557/2.27.4.325
Jerod A. Merkle, Paul R. Krausman, Dan W. Stark, John K. Oakleaf, Warren B. Ballard, SUMMER DIET OF THE MEXICAN GRAY WOLF (CANIS LUPUS BAILEYI) Southwestern Naturalist. ,vol. 54, pp. 480- 485 ,(2009) , 10.1894/CLG-26.1
Francesca Marucco, Daniel H. Pletscher, Luigi Boitani, Accuracy of scat sampling for carnivore diet analysis: wolves in the Alps as a case study Journal of Mammalogy. ,vol. 89, pp. 665- 673 ,(2008) , 10.1644/07-MAMM-A-005R3.1
Robin Rigg, Slavomír Finďo, Maria Wechselberger, Martyn L. Gorman, Claudio Sillero-Zubiri, David W. Macdonald, Mitigating carnivore–livestock conflict in Europe: lessons from Slovakia Oryx. ,vol. 45, pp. 272- 280 ,(2011) , 10.1017/S0030605310000074
Unn KLARE, Jan F. KAMLER, David W. MACDONALD, A comparison and critique of different scat‐analysis methods for determining carnivore diet Mammal Review. ,vol. 41, pp. 294- 312 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1365-2907.2011.00183.X
John B. Theberge, Thomas J. Cottrell, Food Habits of Wolves in Kluane National Park Arctic. ,vol. 30, pp. 189- 191 ,(1977) , 10.14430/ARCTIC2699