Developing a reparability indicator for electronic products

作者: Bas Flipsen , Conny Bakker , Guus van Bohemen

DOI: 10.1109/EGG.2016.7829855

关键词:

摘要: Repair is a way to extend the life of product. In circular economy where resource loops are closed maximum extent, repair belongs ‘inner loops’. Repairing product preserve value by slowing down product's economic devaluation. The aim paper development reparability indicator: measure determine ease indicator developed for self-repair: done in noncommercial context, laypersons who lack access specialized workshop. Given large diversity products on market, it was decided focus consumer electronic products. consists two parts. first part review literature (design for) products, and indicators. A commonly used empirically tested with 25 Dutch participants. This concludes that currently available guidelines, criteria indicators provide valuable starting point, but tend structure, clarity organization. second highlights an improved indicator. step this ‘crowdsource’ from MOOC Circular Economy: Introduction, which ran October – December edX platform. One assignments criteria. Almost 2000 discrete entries were analysed, grouped structured into 26 These have been consistency group 46 students TU Delft March 2016. will present results test as well

参考文章(9)
Krishna B. Misra, Dependability Considerations in the Design of a System Springer London. pp. 71- 80 ,(2008) , 10.1007/978-1-84800-131-2_6
C.A. Bakker, F. Fakhredin, J.M.P. Geraedts, Designer focused quickscan recyclability assessment method Proceedings of CARE Innovation 2014 “Going Green” Conference, Vienna, Austria, 17-20 November 2014. ,(2014)
M. Lindahl, E. Sundin, J. Östlin, M. Björkman, Concepts and definitions for product recovery Analysis and clarification of the terminology used in academia and industry 12th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Grenoble, France, April, 2006. pp. 123- 138 ,(2006) , 10.1007/1-4020-4617-0_8
Ehud Kroll, Thomas A. Hanft, Quantitative evaluation of product disassembly for recycling Research in Engineering Design. ,vol. 10, pp. 1- 14 ,(1998) , 10.1007/BF01580266
Anoop Desai, Anil Mital, Evaluation of disassemblability to enable design for disassembly in mass production International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. ,vol. 32, pp. 265- 281 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0169-8141(03)00067-2
Phillip Dawson, Assessment rubrics: towards clearer and more replicable design, research and practice Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. ,vol. 42, pp. 347- 360 ,(2017) , 10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294
S. Fukuda, HOW CAN WE SATISFY OUR CREATIVE CUSTOMERS DS 60: Proceedings of DESIGN 2010, the 11th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia. pp. 555- 562 ,(2010)
Forner Javier Sanfélix, Ardente Fulvio, Mathieux Fabrice, Integration of resource efficiency and waste management criteria in European product policies – Second phase. Report n° 1. Analysis of Durability Publications Office of the European Union. ,(2012) , 10.2788/72577