A Matter of Trust : Introducing the Journal Scientific Integrity Policy

作者: Jay M. McDonald , Maria Giorla Eisemann , Audra E. Cox

DOI: 10.2353/AJPATH.2007.070458

关键词:

摘要: Scientific publishing relies on the trust between a journal and its readership: that experiments have been ethically performed faithfully documented, research report has carefully vetted by experts in field, publication process executed thoughtful timely manner. Such ideals are not new to The American Journal of Pathology; we always valued scientific integrity followed recommendations International Committee Medical Editors (ICMJE1). However, provide greater transparency accountability for our expectations authors reviewers, as well delineate what readers should expect from us, established formal Integrity Policy.2 This Policy covers authors, Editors, staff includes clear definitions constitutes acceptable behavior misconduct. importance disclosing conflicts interest, whether financial or personal, maintaining confidentiality is stressed, both critical blinded peer-review process. Further, reminded take their responsibilities seriously perform duties Authorship contributor criteria clearly defined, undertaking involving all coauthors ensure full awareness conflict disclosure newly submitted manuscripts. Copyright reiterated, especially light affiliation with PubMed Central recent launch fastPATH (pre-print publication). Importantly, following issues relating misconduct discussed: treatment subjects animals, fabrication falsification data (including image manipulation), plagiarism, redundant publication. Of course, guidelines useless without providing appropriate means explaining procedures handling complaints. Written complaints regarding be directed Editorial Office, concerns Executive Officer Society Investigative Pathology. outlines allegations findings misconduct, possible repercussions. Accompanying revised Instructions Authors3 Reviewers.4 described better understanding how various manuscript types, including solicited articles, handled reviewed. Definitions Corrections, Retractions, Notes Concern included these descriptions. Manuscript preparation instructions now include more detailed preparing Title, Abstract, Materials Methods. Abstract word limit expanded 220 words, allowing enhanced summary study details. Reviewers also explicit editorial reviewing scope, content, quality reviewed manuscripts. The establishment written policies confirms AJP’s commitment ensuring publishing. And alone this quest: We very grateful dedicated members ICMJE, Council Science (which recently published CSE White Paper Promoting Publications)5 US Department Health Human Services’ Office Research Integrity6 writing strive uphold ethics process, conducting reporting results. At AJP, believe necessary next step lasting success reliability continue relationship readers.

参考文章(0)