Improving the surrogacy effectiveness of charismatic megafauna with well-surveyed taxonomic groups and habitat types

作者: Enrico Di Minin , Atte Moilanen

DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12203

关键词:

摘要: Summary 1. Conservation planning often relies on the use of surrogates for representing many aspects biodiversity. Previous tests effectiveness charismatic mammals as biodiversity have suffered from lack fine-resolution data and produced varied contrasting results. 2. In this study, we used unique high-resolution more than 600 features Maputaland–Pondoland–Albany global hot spot to assess how surrogacy ‘Big Five’ mammal species could be improved. 3. We found that combining with well-known surveyed taxonomic groups, such birds, amphibians reptiles, habitat types, which can mapped quickly inexpensively, increases representation poorly endemic threatened invertebrate plant species, well other species. particular, types were an integral component a successful surrogate strategy. Nevertheless, broad cross-taxon group composed Five’, was effective their own. Meanwhile, groups not 4. As important marketing value, they promoted generate funding, then facilitate implementation conservation action cover management costs, thereby indirectly benefiting 5. Synthesis applications. While some geographic areas taxa been extensively studied, detailed information about distributions is missing much world. This study provides operational relevance prioritize in world poor are good also necessary strategies plants insects. Overall, combination mammals, complemented (birds, reptiles), provided highest effects.

参考文章(52)
Sandy A. Andelman, Hugh Possingham, Kerrie Wilson, C.H. Vynne, Protected areas: Goals, limitations, and design Principles of Conservation Biology. [3rd ed.]. pp. 507- 549 ,(2006)
Ladislav Mucina, M. Rutherford, The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland.. ,(2006)
Andrew Balmford, Kevin J Gaston, Why biodiversity surveys are good value Nature. ,vol. 398, pp. 204- 205 ,(1999) , 10.1038/18339
E. Di Minin, I. Fraser, R. Slotow, D. C. MacMillan, Understanding heterogeneous preference of tourists for big game species: implications for conservation and management Animal Conservation. ,vol. 16, pp. 249- 258 ,(2013) , 10.1111/J.1469-1795.2012.00595.X
E. Di Minin, I. Fraser, R. Slotow, D. C. MacMillan, Conservation marketing and education for less charismatic biodiversity and conservation businesses for sustainable development Animal Conservation. ,vol. 16, pp. 263- 264 ,(2013) , 10.1111/ACV.12060
Frank Wugt Larsen, Jesper Bladt, Andrew Balmford, Carsten Rahbek, Birds as biodiversity surrogates: will supplementing birds with other taxa improve effectiveness? Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 49, pp. 349- 356 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1365-2664.2011.02094.X
Hedley S. Grantham, Atte Moilanen, Kerrie A. Wilson, Robert L. Pressey, Tony G. Rebelo, Hugh P. Possingham, Diminishing return on investment for biodiversity data in conservation planning Conservation Letters. ,vol. 1, pp. 190- 198 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1755-263X.2008.00029.X
Matthew J. Walpole, Nigel Leader‐Williams, Tourism and flagship species in conservation Biodiversity and Conservation. ,vol. 11, pp. 543- 547 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1014864708777
ADAM S. LEWANDOWSKI, REED F. NOSS, DAVID R. PARSONS, The Effectiveness of Surrogate Taxa for the Representation of Biodiversity Conservation Biology. ,vol. 24, pp. 1367- 1377 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2010.01513.X
Hong Qian, Robert E. Ricklefs, Global concordance in diversity patterns of vascular plants and terrestrial vertebrates. Ecology Letters. ,vol. 11, pp. 547- 553 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1461-0248.2008.01168.X