More on how and why: a response to commentaries

作者: Kevin N. Laland , John Odling-Smee , William Hoppitt , Tobias Uller

DOI: 10.1007/S10539-013-9380-4

关键词:

摘要: We are grateful to the commentators for taking time respond our article. Too many interesting and important points have been raised us tackle them all in this response, so below we sought draw out major themes. These include problems with both term ‘ultimate causation’ proximate-ultimate causation dichotomy more generally, clarification of meaning reciprocal causation, discussion issues related nature development phenotypic plasticity their roles evolution, consideration need an extended evolutionary synthesis.

参考文章(73)
Ward B. Watt, Avoiding Paradigm-Based Limits to Knowledge of Evolution Springer, Boston, MA. pp. 73- 96 ,(2000) , 10.1007/978-1-4615-4135-6_4
Mary P Winsor, The creation of the essentialism story: an exercise in metahistory. History and Philosophy of The Life Sciences. ,vol. 28, pp. 149- ,(2006)
André Ariew, Ernst Mayr's 'ultimate / proximate' distinction reconsidered and reconstructed Biology and Philosophy. ,vol. 18, pp. 553- 565 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1025565119032
Patrick Bateson, Peter Gluckman, Plasticity, Robustness, Development and Evolution ,(2011)
Paul E. Griffiths, Russell D. Gray, Susan Oyama, Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution MIT Press. ,(2001)
Stephen Jay Gould, The Structure of Evolutionary Theory ,(2002)
Mary Jane West-Eberhard, Developmental plasticity and evolution ,(2003)
Johan J. Bolhuis, Jerry A. Hogan, Causal Mechanisms of Behavioural Development ,(1994)