The effect of genotypical and phenotypical variation in taste sensitivity on liking of ice cream and dietary fat intake

作者: Yuchi Shen , Orla B. Kennedy , Lisa Methven

DOI: 10.1016/J.FOODQUAL.2016.08.010

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Emerging evidence suggests fat can be perceived as a taste. G-protein coupled receptors well CD36 , fatty acid translocase, have been proposed to involved in perception. Therefore, differences number of and genotype both influence inter-individual taste Fungiform papillae density (FPD) PROP taster status are phenotypes related receptor number. Previous authors an association between such CA6 (gustin) genotype, because the latter influences cell proliferation. The effect these factors on perception, preference intake, requires further investigation. main aim this study was investigate effects sensitivity, including genotypic phenotypic variation, liking ice cream dietary intake. Participants (n = 136) age 18–55 years were recruited UK. Hedonic results demonstrated that for significantly affected by content sample, demographic (gender, ethnicity, age) but not consumers rs1761667 or rs2274333 nor FPD. However, categorising sensitivity from participant responses salt alone (rather than PROP) found significant differences, with low perceivers high (20%) substantially more medium- perceivers. This indicated increased reduced fat. Cluster analysis highlighted one group (18%) liked higher cream, whereas another (30%) lower compared 52% regardless content. There groups sensitivity. Concerning recorded high-fat liker dairy product consumption dislikers. Fat intake percentage total energy however minor allele frequency at is too draw firm conclusions within population.

参考文章(59)
B. Le Calvé, C. Saint-Léger, R. Babas, J.-L. Gelin, A. Parker, P. Erni, I. Cayeux, Fat Perception: How Sensitive are We? Journal of Texture Studies. ,vol. 46, pp. 200- 211 ,(2015) , 10.1111/JTXS.12120
W C Miller, A K Lindeman, J Wallace, M Niederpruem, Diet composition, energy intake, and exercise in relation to body fat in men and women. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. ,vol. 52, pp. 426- 430 ,(1990) , 10.1093/AJCN/52.3.426
Arline D Salbe, Angelo DelParigi, Richard E Pratley, Adam Drewnowski, P Antonio Tataranni, Taste preferences and body weight changes in an obesity-prone population The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. ,vol. 79, pp. 372- 378 ,(2004) , 10.1093/AJCN/79.3.372
BEVERLY J. TEPPER, RICKY J. NURSE, PROP Taster Status Is Related to Fat Perception and Preferencea Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. ,vol. 855, pp. 802- 804 ,(1998) , 10.1111/J.1749-6632.1998.TB10662.X
Melania Melis, Elena Atzori, Stefano Cabras, Andrea Zonza, Carla Calò, Patrizia Muroni, Mariella Nieddu, Alessandra Padiglia, Valeria Sogos, Beverly J. Tepper, Iole Tomassini Barbarossa, The Gustin (CA6) Gene Polymorphism, rs2274333 (A/G), as a Mechanistic Link between PROP Tasting and Fungiform Taste Papilla Density and Maintenance PLoS ONE. ,vol. 8, pp. e74151- 15 ,(2013) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0074151
Charlotte J. Harden, Bernard M. Corfe, J. Craig Richardson, Peter W. Dettmar, Jenny R. Paxman, Body mass index and age affect Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire scores in male subjects Nutrition Research. ,vol. 29, pp. 379- 382 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.NUTRES.2009.04.001
Robert I Henkin, Brian M. Martin, Raghunath P. Agarwal, Efficacy of Exogenous Oral Zinc in Treatment of Patients with Carbonic Anhydrase VI Deficiency The American Journal of the Medical Sciences. ,vol. 318, pp. 392- 405 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0002-9629(15)40664-0
Beverly J. Tepper, Carol M. Christensen, Jean Cao, Development of brief methods to classify individuals by PROP taster status. Physiology & Behavior. ,vol. 73, pp. 571- 577 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0031-9384(01)00500-5
David J. Mela, Determinants of Food Choice: Relationships with Obesity and Weight Control Obesity Research. ,vol. 9, pp. 249S- 255S ,(2001) , 10.1038/OBY.2001.127
G ESSICK, A CHOPRA, S GUEST, F MCGLONE, Lingual tactile acuity, taste perception, and the density and diameter of fungiform papillae in female subjects Physiology & Behavior. ,vol. 80, pp. 289- 302 ,(2003) , 10.1016/J.PHYSBEH.2003.08.007