The propensity to exit and innovation

作者: David B. Audretsch

DOI: 10.1007/BF01026884

关键词:

摘要: In offering an answer to the question, “Who exits and why?”, I introduce a model relating decision remain in, or exit from industry, conditions of demand underlying technology. particular, argue that two elements technology are important — role scale economies in industry extent which technological information can be characterized by either entrepreneurial routinized regime. Based on evidence over 300 U.S. manufacturing industries, conclude process firm selection evolution tends conform revolving door, where bulk exiting businesses new entrants, else metaphor forest, incumbent establishments tend displaced entrants.

参考文章(47)
Laurie Beth Evans, John J. Siegfried, Entry and exit in United States manufacturing industries from 1977 to 1982 Springer Netherlands. pp. 253- 273 ,(1992) , 10.1007/978-94-011-2795-0_14
Dario Cossutta, Michele Grillo, Excess Capacity, Sunk Costs and Collusion: A Non-Cooperative Bargaining Game International Journal of Industrial Organization. ,vol. 4, pp. 251- 270 ,(1986) , 10.1016/0167-7187(86)90020-2
Steven Klepper, Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle The American Economic Review. ,vol. 86, pp. 562- 583 ,(1996)
Richard R. Nelson, Sidney G. Winter, Forces Generating and Limiting Concentration under Schumpeterian Competition The Bell Journal of Economics. ,vol. 9, pp. 524- 548 ,(1978) , 10.2307/3003597
Kathryn Rudie Harrigan, None, Strategies for Declining Businesses ,(1980)
Zoltán J. Ács, David B. Audretsch, Innovation and Small Firms ,(1990)
Paul Geroski, Joachim Schwalbach, Entry and Market Contestability: An International Comparison ,(1991)