Assessing stakeholder perceptions of landscape and place in the context of a major river intervention : a call for their inclusion in adaptive management

作者: Riyan J. G. van den Born , Laura N. H. Verbrugge , Wessel Ganzevoort

DOI: 10.2166/WP.2019.073

关键词:

摘要: Adaptive management strategies are required to manage multi-actor and multifunctional river landscapes. Such need be inclusive of perspectives different stakeholders. We present a case study pilot engineering project in the Dutch Waal, which drastically changed appearance landscape. perceptions four stakeholder groups (residents, recreational anglers, boaters shipping professionals) regarding impacts this intervention on landscape values, including aesthetics, naturalness, biodiversity, flood safety accessibility. Results show that stakeholders differ functions they find important how perceive longitudinal dams influence They also levels place attachment trust responsible authority. Shipping professionals stand out for their more negative evaluations compared other stakeholders, while especially residents demonstrate high identity connection with nature. Residents feel improving risk area, positively evaluate knowledge skills water managers. These results provide managers much needed insights into valued by those perceived as most endangered interventions.

参考文章(57)
Fred Johnson, Ken Williams, Protocol and Practice in the Adaptive Management of Waterfowl Harvests Conservation Ecology. ,vol. 3, pp. 8- ,(1999) , 10.5751/ES-00091-030108
Berit Junker, Mattias Buchecker, Ulrike Müller-Böker, Objectives of public participation: Which actors should be involved in the decision making for river restorations? Water Resources Research. ,vol. 43, pp. 1- 11 ,(2007) , 10.1029/2006WR005584
Gemma Carr, Stakeholder and public participation in river basin management-an introduction. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water. ,vol. 2, pp. 393- 405 ,(2015) , 10.1002/WAT2.1086
Jan E. Vermaat, Alfred J. Wagtendonk, Roy Brouwer, Oleg Sheremet, Erik Ansink, Tim Brockhoff, Maarten Plug, Seppo Hellsten, Jukka Aroviita, Luiza Tylec, Marek Giełczewski, Lukas Kohut, Karel Brabec, Jantine Haverkamp, Michaela Poppe, Kerstin Böck, Matthijs Coerssen, Joel Segersten, Daniel Hering, Assessing the societal benefits of river restoration using the ecosystem services approach Hydrobiologia. ,vol. 769, pp. 121- 135 ,(2016) , 10.1007/S10750-015-2482-Z
Andrew Wohl, Ellen, Lane, Stuart, Wilcox, The science and practice of river restoration Water Resources Research. ,vol. 51, pp. 5974- 5997 ,(2015) , 10.1002/2014WR016874
Jens Newig, Edward Challies, Nicolas Jager, Elisa Kochskämper, What Role for Public Participation in Implementing the EU Floods Directive? A comparison with the Water Framework Directive, early evidence from Germany, and a research agenda Environmental Policy and Governance. ,vol. 24, pp. 275- 288 ,(2014) , 10.1002/EET.1650
E. Ulrika Åberg, Sue Tapsell, Revisiting the River Skerne: The long-term social benefits of river rehabilitation Landscape and Urban Planning. ,vol. 113, pp. 94- 103 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2013.01.009
Ruth Rogan, Moira O’Connor, Pierre Horwitz, Nowhere to hide: Awareness and perceptions of environmental change, and their influence on relationships with place Journal of Environmental Psychology. ,vol. 25, pp. 147- 158 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.JENVP.2005.03.001
Saskia van Vuren, Andries Paarlberg, Hendrik Havinga, The aftermath of “Room for the River” and restoration works: Coping with excessive maintenance dredging Journal of Hydro-environment Research. ,vol. 9, pp. 172- 186 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.JHER.2015.02.001