Bayesian adjusted R 2 for the meta-analytic evaluation of surrogate time-to-event endpoints in clinical trials

作者: Lindsay A. Renfro , Qian Shi , Daniel J. Sargent , Bradley P. Carlin

DOI: 10.1002/SIM.4416

关键词:

摘要: A two-stage model for evaluating both trial-level and patient-level surrogacy of correlated time-to-event endpoints has been introduced, using data when multiple clinical trials are available. However, the associated maximum likelihood approach often suffers from numerical problems different baseline hazards among imperfect estimation treatment effects assumed. To address this issue, we propose performing second-stage, evaluation potential surrogates within a Bayesian framework, where may naturally borrow information across while maintaining these realistic assumptions. Posterior distributions on measures interest then be used to compare or make decisions regarding candidacy specific endpoint. We perform simulation study investigate differences in performance between traditional new representations common meta-analytic measures, assessing sensitivity characteristics such as number trials, trial size, amount censoring. Furthermore, present frequentist evaluations time recurrence overall survival two meta-analyses adjuvant therapy colon cancer. With results, recommend an attractive numerically stable alternative multitrial assessment surrogate endpoints.

参考文章(33)
Tomasz Burzykowski, José Cortiñas Abrahantes, Validation in the Case of Two Failure-time Endpoints Springer, New York, NY. pp. 163- 194 ,(2005) , 10.1007/0-387-27080-9_11
Victor G De Gruttola, Pamela Clax, David L DeMets, Gregory J Downing, Susan S Ellenberg, Lawrence Friedman, Mitchell H Gail, Ross Prentice, Janet Wittes, Scott L Zeger, Considerations in the Evaluation of Surrogate Endpoints in Clinical Trials Controlled Clinical Trials. ,vol. 22, pp. 485- 502 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0197-2456(01)00153-2
David R. Cox, Regression Models and Life-Tables Springer Series in Statistics. ,vol. 34, pp. 527- 541 ,(1992) , 10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_37
Ariel Alonso, Geert Molenberghs, Surrogate marker evaluation from an information theory perspective. Biometrics. ,vol. 63, pp. 180- 186 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1541-0420.2006.00634.X
José Cortiñas Abrahantes, Geert Molenberghs, Tomasz Burzykowski, Ziv Shkedy, Ariel Alonso Abad, Didier Renard, Choice of units of analysis and modeling strategies in multilevel hierarchical models Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. ,vol. 47, pp. 537- 563 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.CSDA.2003.12.003
Marc Buyse, Geert Molenberghs, Criteria for the validation of surrogate endpoints in randomized experiments Biometrics. ,vol. 54, pp. 1014- 1029 ,(1998) , 10.2307/2533853
Tomasz Burzykowski, Surrogate endpoints: wishful thinking or reality? Statistical Methods in Medical Research. ,vol. 17, pp. 463- 466 ,(2008) , 10.1177/0962280207081866
Qian Shi, Lindsay A. Renfro, Brian M. Bot, Tomasz Burzykowski, Marc Buyse, Daniel J. Sargent, Comparative assessment of trial-level surrogacy measures for candidate time-to-event surrogate endpoints in clinical trials Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. ,vol. 55, pp. 2748- 2757 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.CSDA.2011.03.014
Christian Genest, Jock Mackay, The Joy of Copulas: Bivariate Distributions with Uniform Marginals The American Statistician. ,vol. 40, pp. 280- 283 ,(1986) , 10.1080/00031305.1986.10475414