作者: Ashwini K. Rao , Lisa Muratori , Elan D. Louis , Carol B. Moskowitz , Karen S. Marder
DOI: 10.1016/J.GAITPOST.2008.11.002
关键词:
摘要: Abstract Background Mobility and balance in Huntington's disease (HD) are currently assessed the clinic with three items from unified rating scale (UHDRS): walk, tandem pull tests. These tests may not be optimal because they scored on an ordinal do test anticipatory balance. We tested validity responsiveness of clinical mobility Methods Three (FRT, timed up go (TUG), Berg (BBS)) were validated seven quantitative gait measures two indicators functional limitation (HD-ADL total capacity) 30 subjects HD. also for to severity. Results FRT BBS correlated five measures, TUG eight (all p Conclusions FRT, valid, responsive easy administer that should routinely included UHDRS therapeutic trials