Southern Regional Science in Interstitial Space

作者: Mark S. Henry

DOI: 10.52324/001C.8366

关键词:

摘要: Regional science has a variety of characteristics that distinguish it from its sister social sciences: works the boundaries economics, geography, planning studies, and sociology; space is focus; spatial dependence core concern; comparative advantage remains key concept for understanding how will develop. Facing new old challenges global competition, lagging regions U.S., especially in rural South, need ideas regional on to fit into emerging economy ways promote higher incomes across all deciles income distribution.

参考文章(14)
David L. Barkley, Communities Left Behind: Can Nonviable Places Become Smart? The Review of Regional Studies. ,vol. 28, pp. 1- 18 ,(1998) , 10.52324/001C.8884
Friedman Tl, War of ideas. The New York times on the Web. ,(2002)
Thomas G. Johnson, Where is the Place in Space The Review of Regional Studies. ,vol. 32, pp. 9- 17 ,(2002) , 10.52324/001C.8436
Edward K. Malecki, Global Cities and Back Roads: Perspectives on the Southern Economy The Review of Regional Studies. ,vol. 25, pp. 237- 246 ,(1995) , 10.52324/001C.9008
Robert M. Gibbs, Reconsidering the Southern Black Belt The Review of Regional Studies. ,vol. 33, pp. 254- 263 ,(2003) , 10.52324/001C.8429
Paul Krugman, Space: The Final Frontier Journal of Economic Perspectives. ,vol. 12, pp. 161- 174 ,(1998) , 10.1257/JEP.12.2.161
William Alonso, Location and land use ,(1964)