Reconsidering the Southern Black Belt

作者: Robert M. Gibbs

DOI: 10.52324/001C.8429

关键词: PopulationCivil societyDevelopment economicsPaternalismrestrictAgricultureOptimismSociologyBlack beltEconomic growthSocial exclusion

摘要: The portion of the South known as “Black Belt” lies at heart what was once cotton-and-tobacco plantation region and retains a large black population. Despite Black Belt’s high poverty rates relatively slow economic growth, its net loss blacks to urban areas over course twentieth century has effectively ended more are now returning. Rural southern still face low-wage economy their prospects conditioned by legacy both agricultural paternalism and, due interregional migration, inner-city decline. A number writers have noted importance familial community ties for returnees express cautious optimism about abilities further erode region’s old social barriers. More generally, anti-poverty strategies in Belt, public private, will be successful only insofar they sensitive exclusion that continues restrict full participation rural labor markets civil society.

参考文章(20)
Mark S. Henry, Willis Lewis, Welfare Reform: Remedy for Persistent Poverty in the Rural South?. Rural America. ,vol. 15, pp. 59- 67 ,(2001)
David A. McGranahan, New Economy Manufacturing Meets Old Economy Education Policies in the Rural South. Rural America. ,vol. 15, pp. 19- 27 ,(2001)
William Levernier, Mark D. Partridge, Dan S. Rickman, The Causes of Regional Variations in U.S. Poverty: A Cross‐County Analysis Journal of Regional Science. ,vol. 40, pp. 473- 497 ,(2000) , 10.1111/0022-4146.00184
Mark S. Henry, Shuming Bao, David L. Barkley, The Role of Local School Quality in Rural Employment and Population Growth The Review of Regional Studies. ,vol. 28, pp. 81- 102 ,(1998) , 10.52324/001C.8882
Robert M. Gibbs, Ruy A. Teixeira, Paul L. Swaim, Rural Education and Training in the New Economy: The Myth of the Rural Skills Gap. Iowa State University Press. ,(1998)
David L. Barkley, The Economics of Change in Rural America American Journal of Agricultural Economics. ,vol. 77, pp. 1252- 1258 ,(1995) , 10.2307/1243357