How practitioners integrate decision triggers with existing metrics in conservation monitoring.

作者: Claire N. Foster , Luke S. O'Loughlin , Chloe F. Sato , Martin J. Westgate , Philip S. Barton

DOI: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2018.09.067

关键词:

摘要: Decision triggers are defined thresholds in the status of monitored variables that indicate when to undertake management, and avoid undesirable ecosystem change. frequently recommended conservation practitioners as a tool facilitate evidence-based management practices, but there has been limited attention paid how integrating decision into existing monitoring programs. We sought understand whether practitioners' use was influenced by type their investigated this question using practitioner-focused workshop involving structured discussion review eight Among our case studies, direct measures biodiversity (e.g. native species) were more commonly monitored, less likely be linked (10% with triggers) than being used surrogates (54% for program objectives. This because associated threatening processes, which often surrogate asset interest. By contrast, informal processes led activities such reviews or external consultation. Workshop participants favor including formalized programs, incomplete ecological knowledge, lack appropriately skilled staff, funding constraints, and/or uncertainty regarding intervention effectiveness. recommend consider (such consultation) programs just early warning points future interventions, particularly measures. discussions should recognized critical feature where information operational limitations inhibit interventions.

参考文章(28)
C. Boland, H. Cogger, D. Maple, B. Tiernan, P. Smith, F. Napier, T. Detto, M. J. Smith, An oceanic island reptile community under threat: the decline of reptiles on Christmas Island, Indian Ocean. Herpetological Conservation and Biology. ,vol. 7, pp. 206- 218 ,(2012)
David Lindenmayer, Jennifer Pierson, Philip Barton, Maria Beger, Cristina Branquinho, Aram Calhoun, Tim Caro, Hamish Greig, John Gross, Jani Heino, Malcolm Hunter, Peter Lane, Catherine Longo, Kathy Martin, William H. McDowell, Camille Mellin, Hanna Salo, Ayesha Tulloch, Martin Westgate, A new framework for selecting environmental surrogates Science of The Total Environment. ,vol. 538, pp. 1029- 1038 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2015.08.056
S.K. Papworth, J. Rist, L. Coad, E.J. Milner-Gulland, Evidence for shifting baseline syndrome in conservation Conservation Letters. ,vol. 2, pp. 93- 100 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1755-263X.2009.00049.X
David B. Lindenmayer, Philip S. Barton, Peter W. Lane, Martin J. Westgate, Lachlan McBurney, David Blair, Philip Gibbons, Gene E. Likens, An empirical assessment and comparison of species-based and habitat-based surrogates: a case study of forest vertebrates and large old trees. PLOS ONE. ,vol. 9, ,(2014) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0089807
Martin J. Westgate, Gene E. Likens, David B. Lindenmayer, Adaptive management of biological systems: A review Biological Conservation. ,vol. 158, pp. 128- 139 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2012.08.016
J NICHOLS, B WILLIAMS, Monitoring for conservation Trends in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 21, pp. 668- 673 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.TREE.2006.08.007
Martin Hejda, Petr Pyšek, Vojtěch Jarošík, Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities Journal of Ecology. ,vol. 97, pp. 393- 403 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1365-2745.2009.01480.X
Peter Duelli, Martin K Obrist, Biodiversity indicators: the choice of values and measures Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. ,vol. 98, pp. 87- 98 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00072-0
Scott E. Nielsen, Diane L. Haughland, Erin Bayne, Jim Schieck, Capacity of large-scale, long-term biodiversity monitoring programmes to detect trends in species prevalence Biodiversity and Conservation. ,vol. 18, pp. 2961- 2978 ,(2009) , 10.1007/S10531-009-9619-1