What can deliberative approaches bring to the monetary valuation of ecosystem services? A literature review

作者: Lukas Bunse , Olivia Rendon , Sandra Luque

DOI: 10.1016/J.ECOSER.2015.05.004

关键词:

摘要: In response to extensive criticism of the monetary valuation ecosystem services deliberative (DMV) has been proposed as an improved approach that combines benefits decision-making with advantages values. this study body literature developed in field is reviewed assess potential and challenges can bring services. The studies present a range approaches DMV based on different paradigms methods. While implemented were primarily concerned improving values within neoclassical economic paradigm, proposals for theoretical papers are challenging paradigm stress produce more democratic equitable It was found still faces large practical challenges, most notably lack base interpretation produced. Before these addressed it early days usefulness

参考文章(91)
Frank Wätzold, Nele Lienhoop, Martin Drechsler, Josef Settele, Estimating optimal conservation in the context of agri-environmental schemes Ecological Economics. ,vol. 68, pp. 295- 305 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2008.03.007
Nobuyuki Ito, Kenji Takeuchi, Koichi Kuriyama, Yasushi Shoji, Takahiro Tsuge, Yohei Mitani, The influence of decision-making rules on individual preferences for ecological restoration: Evidence from an experimental survey Ecological Economics. ,vol. 68, pp. 2426- 2431 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2009.03.022
J. Bohman, Survey Article: The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy Journal of Political Philosophy. ,vol. 6, pp. 400- 425 ,(1998) , 10.1111/1467-9760.00061
Clive L Spash, Broadening Democracy in Environmental Policy Processes Environment and Planning C-government and Policy. ,vol. 19, pp. 475- 481 ,(2001) , 10.1068/C1904ED
B. K. Jack, C. Kousky, K. R. E. Sims, Designing payments for ecosystem services: Lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 105, pp. 9465- 9470 ,(2008) , 10.1073/PNAS.0705503104
Judy Clark, Jacquelin Burgess, Carolyn M Harrison, “I struggled with this money business”: respondents’ perspectives on contingent valuation Ecological Economics. ,vol. 33, pp. 45- 62 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00118-4
Matthew A Wilson, Richard B Howarth, Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation Ecological Economics. ,vol. 41, pp. 431- 443 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00092-7
Nele Lienhoop, Douglas C. MacMillan, Contingent Valuation: Comparing Participant Performance in Group-Based Approaches and Personal Interviews Environmental Values. ,vol. 16, pp. 209- 232 ,(2007) , 10.3197/096327107780474500
John P Hoehn, Alan Randall, The effect of resource quality information on resource injury perceptions and contingent values Resource and Energy Economics. ,vol. 24, pp. 13- 31 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0928-7655(01)00051-3