Wildlife Deterrent Methods for Railways—An Experimental Study

作者: Andreas Seiler , Mattias Olsson

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-57496-7_17

关键词:

摘要: Since reliable accident statistics and consequent costs have become available, train collisions with wildlife, especially ungulates, received increasing attention in Sweden. In contrast to on roads, accidents involving wildlife railways do not entail human injury or death, but can cause substantial damage lead significant delays railway traffic. Wildlife-train (WTC) are rising numbers appear as a greater source of ungulate mortality per kilometer than roads. Nevertheless, largely unprotected against collisions, mitigation measures that hitherto been applied roads either infeasible economically unviable for railways. The Swedish Transport Administration is therefore seeking innovative cost-effective preventing larger wild animals. this chapter, we present research WTC Sweden has used define the baseline set up criteria new project. This project aims develop warning deterring signals encourage animals leave shortly before trains arrive. will be carried out at several experimental crosswalks along fenced where effect different animal behaviour evaluated. If effective, these deterrent systems could replace fencing and/or crossing structures, reduce barrier effects wildlife. was begun 2015 continue least 4 years.

参考文章(19)
A. Seiler, J. O. Helldin, Mortality in wildlife due to transportation Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 165- 189 ,(2006) , 10.1007/1-4020-4504-2_8
Joanna Babińska-Werka, Dagny Krauze-Gryz, Michał Wasilewski, Karolina Jasińska, Effectiveness of an acoustic wildlife warning device using natural calls to reduce the risk of train collisions with animals Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment. ,vol. 38, pp. 6- 14 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.TRD.2015.04.021
Roy V. Rea, Kenneth N. Child, Daniel A. Aitken, YOUTUBE TM INSIGHTS INTO MOOSE-TRAIN INTERACTIONS Alces : A Journal Devoted to the Biology and Management of Moose. ,vol. 46, pp. 183- 187 ,(2010)
Marcel P. Huijser, John W. Duffield, Anthony P. Clevenger, Robert J. Ament, Pat T. McGowen, Cost–Benefit Analyses of Mitigation Measures Aimed at Reducing Collisions with Large Ungulates in the United States and Canada: a Decision Support Tool Ecology and Society. ,vol. 14, ,(2009) , 10.5751/ES-03000-140215
John A. Litvaitis, Jeffrey P. Tash, An Approach Toward Understanding Wildlife-Vehicle Collisions Environmental Management. ,vol. 42, pp. 688- 697 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S00267-008-9108-4
Wiebke Neumann, Göran Ericsson, Holger Dettki, Nils Bunnefeld, Nicholas S. Keuler, David P. Helmers, Volker C. Radeloff, Difference in spatiotemporal patterns of wildlife road-crossings and wildlife-vehicle collisions Biological Conservation. ,vol. 145, pp. 70- 78 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2011.10.011
Luís Borda-de-Água, Clara Grilo, Henrique M. Pereira, Modeling the impact of road mortality on barn owl (Tyto alba) populations using age-structured models Ecological Modelling. ,vol. 276, pp. 29- 37 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.ECOLMODEL.2013.12.022
JAMES H. HEDLUND, PAUL D. CURTIS, GWEN CURTIS, ALLAN F. WILLIAMS, Methods to reduce traffic crashes involving deer: what works and what does not. Traffic Injury Prevention. ,vol. 5, pp. 122- 131 ,(2004) , 10.1080/15389580490435079
Jerrold, L. Belant, Thomas, W. Seamans, Laura, A. Tyson, EVALUATION OF ELECTRONIC FRIGHTENING DEVICES AS WHITE-TAILED DEER DETERRENTS Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference. ,vol. 18, ,(1998) , 10.5070/V418110188