The Causal Role Argument against Doxasticism about Delusions
作者： Kengo Miyazono , Lisa Bortolotti
DOI: 10.26913/50302014.0112.0003
关键词:
摘要: In this paper we consider an argument that is very influential in the philosophical literature, from causal role against view delusions are beliefs. The has two premises, many fail to play belief-roles and playing necessary for a mental state be belief. We assess both premises suggest they can resisted.
philpapers.org
avant.edu.pl 参考文章(52)
Edoardo Bisiach, Giuliano Geminiani, Anosognosia related to hemiplegia and hemianopia. Oxford University Press. ,(1991)
David Lewis, Mad Pain and Martian Pain Oxford University Press. pp. 122- 130 ,(1983) , 10.1093/0195032047.003.0009
Kim Sterelny, The representational theory of mind ,(1991)
Lisa Bortolotti, Delusions and Other Irrational Beliefs ,(2010)
Keith Frankish, Delusion: a two-level framework Oxford University Press. ,(2009)
Frank Plumpton Ramsey, The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays ,(1931)
Tim Bayne, Jordi Fernández, Delusion and self-deception: Affective and motivational influences on belief formation In: Bayne, Tim & Fern�ndez, Jordi, editor(s). Delusion and Self-Deception: Affective Influences on Belief Formation. Hove: Psychology Press; 2009. p. 1-20.. pp. 1- 20 ,(2009) , 10.4324/9780203838044
Peter Godfrey-Smith, Complexity and the function of mind in nature ,(1996)
David Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature ,(1970)
G. E. Berrios, Delusions as wrong beliefs : a conceptual history British Journal of Psychiatry. ,vol. 159, pp. 6- 13 ,(1991) , 10.1192/S0007125000296414