Fuzzy cognitive mapping of Baltic Archipelago Sea food webs reveals no cliqued views of the system structure between stakeholder groups

作者: Laura Uusitalo , Susanna Jernberg , Patrik Korn , Riikka Puntila-Dodd , Annaliina Skyttä

DOI: 10.18174/SESMO.2020A16343

关键词:

摘要: Incorporating stakeholder views is a key element in successful environmental management, particularly if the managed system delivers cultural and provisioning ecosystem services directly to stakeholders, or there are conflicting about functioning its optimal management. One such Archipelago Sea Southwestern coast of Finland. It an area with high biodiversity, offering range services, from regulating services. Furthermore, it subjected variety human activities ranging eutrophication marine transport fishing. The management also topic debate, including discussions minimum landing size fish, seal hunting quotas, role cormorants ecosystem. Fuzzy cognitive mapping  offers method evaluate quantitatively compare different actors’ on structure. models can be compared simulated illustrate how they respond various pressure scenarios. This may reveal differences perceptions what important interactions ecosystem, would measures, potentially explaining differing opinions best strategy. In this work, 30 policy makers, scientists, eNGOs, fisheries, recreational users created fuzzy maps (FCMs) food web. We found that despite debate area, stakeholders’ web structure were not clustered based group, i.e. groups did have distinct ideas FCM complexity show pattern group either. While general FCMs indicated shared view across most respondents, was one map stood out. exact setup varied. Across all maps, cod, perch, fishing, zooplankton, herring variables having links other variables.  responses fishing seen as factor affecting components, while increases salinity oxygen levels positive impact multiple components. value approach enable two-way discussion webs pressures

参考文章(36)
Erkki Leppäkoski, Harri Helminen, Jari Hänninen, Minna Tallqvist, Aquatic biodiversity under anthropogenic stress: an insight from the Archipelago Sea (SW Finland) Biodiversity and Conservation. ,vol. 8, pp. 55- 70 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1008805007339
Natalie A. Jones, Helen Ross, Timothy Lynam, Pascal Perez, Anne Leitch, Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods Ecology and Society. ,vol. 16, pp. 46- ,(2011) , 10.5751/ES-03802-160146
James M. Vasslides, Olaf P. Jensen, Fuzzy cognitive mapping in support of integrated ecosystem assessments: Developing a shared conceptual model among stakeholders. Journal of Environmental Management. ,vol. 166, pp. 348- 356 ,(2016) , 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2015.10.038
Aleka Meliadou, Francesca Santoro, Manal R. Nader, Manale Abou Dagher, Shadi Al Indary, Bachir Abi Salloum, Prioritising coastal zone management issues through fuzzy cognitive mapping approach Journal of Environmental Management. ,vol. 97, pp. 56- 68 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2011.11.006
Benjamin F. Hobbs, Stuart A. Ludsin, Roger L. Knight, Phil A. Ryan, Johann Biberhofer, Jan J. H. Ciborowski, FUZZY COGNITIVE MAPPING AS A TOOL TO DEFINE MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES FOR COMPLEX ECOSYSTEMS Ecological Applications. ,vol. 12, pp. 1548- 1565 ,(2002) , 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[1548:FCMAAT]2.0.CO;2
Lívia Markíczy, Jeff Goldberg, A method for eliciting and comparing causal maps Journal of Management. ,vol. 21, pp. 305- 333 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0149-2063(95)90060-8
Benjamin Christen, Chris Kjeldsen, Tommy Dalgaard, Julia Martin-Ortega, Can fuzzy cognitive mapping help in agricultural policy design and communication Land Use Policy. ,vol. 45, pp. 64- 75 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2015.01.001
Areti D Kontogianni, Elpiniki I Papageorgiou, Christos Tourkolias, None, How do you perceive environmental change? Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping informing stakeholder analysis for environmental policy making and non-market valuation soft computing. ,vol. 12, pp. 3725- 3735 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.ASOC.2012.05.003