Guided bone augmentation around a titanium bone-anchored hearing aid implant in canine calvarium: an initial comparison of two barrier membranes.

作者: Susan Sommerlad , Deborah Mackenzie , Carina Johansson , Rick Atwell

DOI: 10.1111/J.1708-8208.2006.00028.X

关键词:

摘要: Background: The placement of a bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) implant in young children may be hampered by the presence thin, poor-quality calvarial bone. use extraskeletal guided skull bone augmentation around titanium is one potential solution. Purpose: To compare effectiveness collagen membrane BioSISt (Cook Biotech Inc., Lafayette, IN, USA) and PGA/PLA barrier membrane, Osseoquest (W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, promoting formation, when combined with cancellous graft, canine calvarium. quality quantity tissue was compared. Materials Methods: A 4-mm BAHA placed cranial parietal 11 dogs. protruded from surface measured distance. Two groups, each three dogs, received an implant, either or membrane. Three dogs graft (positive controls), two only (negative controls). Samples were retrieved at 3, 6, 9 months after placement. Undecalcified histologic histomorphometric assessments made augmented thickness, gain factors calculated for sample group. Results: process osseointegration implants ongoing increased over time. Bone generation occurred both test membranes early trabecular that formed, matured, remodelled to compact months. samples showed superior compared exhibited thinner persistent inflammation. Quantitatively, statistically greater new contact area than positive negative controls, whereas did not. factor BioSiSt controls Conclusions: In this study, promoted formation polyglycolic/polylactic acid-based Further investigation warranted.

参考文章(24)
Carina B. Johansson, On tissue reactions to metal implants ,(1991)
Franci Stavropoulos, Christer Dahlin, James D. Ruskin, Carina Johansson, A comparative study of barrier membranes as graft protectors in the treatment of localized bone defects. An experimental study in a canine model. Clinical Oral Implants Research. ,vol. 15, pp. 435- 442 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1600-0501.2004.01029.X
C.B. Johansson, P. Morberg, Importance of ground section thickness for reliable histomorphometrical results Biomaterials. ,vol. 16, pp. 91- 95 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0142-9612(95)98268-J
Andreas Stavropoulos, Jens R. Nyengaard, Lambros Kostopoulos, Thorkild Karring, Implant placement in bone formed beyond the skeletal envelope by means of guided tissue regeneration: an experimental study in the rat. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. ,vol. 32, pp. 1108- 1115 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1600-051X.2005.00756.X
Ulf M. E. Wikesj, Rolf Nilvéus, Periodontal repair in dogs: effect of wound stabilization on healing. Journal of Periodontology. ,vol. 61, pp. 719- 724 ,(1990) , 10.1902/JOP.1990.61.12.719
Kevin M Clarke, Gary C Lantz, S Kathleen Salisbury, Stephen F Badylak, Michael C Hiles, Sherry L Voytik, None, Intestine Submucosa and Polypropylene Mesh for Abdominal Wall Repair in Dogs Journal of Surgical Research. ,vol. 60, pp. 107- 114 ,(1996) , 10.1006/JSRE.1996.0018