Is There a Survival Benefit to Adjuvant Radiotherapy in High-Risk Surgical Stage I Endometrial Cancer?

作者: Ali Ayhan , Cagatay Taskiran , Cetin Celik , Inci Guney , Kunter Yuce

DOI: 10.1006/GYNO.2002.6630

关键词:

摘要: Abstract Objective. The aim of this study was to examine the effects therapeutic modalities on survival stage I endometrial cancer and also evaluate surgical morbidity prognostic importance surgicopathological variables. Methods. A hundred ninety-six patients treated at Hacettepe University Hospital between 1982 1997 were included. After initial diagnosis all underwent procedures including peritoneal cytology, infracolic omentectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salphingoopherectomy, complete pelvic–paraaortic lymphadenectomy. mean age 56 years (SD = 9.9 years) followed 3–18 (median, 8 years). All had endometrioid carcinoma. Stage IC and/or grade 3 tumors considered high-risk factors by definition 147 (75%) low risk 49 (25%) high risk. Forty-nine percent received adjuvant radiotherapy compared with 3.5% in low-risk group. Results. 10-year disease-free overall rates entire group 97 98%, respectively. Ten-year rate for 100% 94% features ( P 0.002). 96% 24 who versus 92% 25 did not receive therapy 0.53). Only a significant predictor poor 0.0004). Overall 8.1% without mortality related surgery. Conclusions. Surgical staging achieved excellent incurring untoward mortality. No advantage detected even patients, so we suggest use may be reserved relapse.

参考文章(20)
D M Larson, K Johnson, K A Olson, Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for surgical staging of endometrial cancer: morbidity and mortality. Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 79, pp. 998- 1001 ,(1992)
M. Chadha, P.J. Nanavati, P. Liu, J. Fanning, A. Jacobs, Patterns of failure in endometrial carcinoma stage IB grade 3 and IC patients treated with postoperative vaginal vault brachytherapy. Gynecologic Oncology. ,vol. 75, pp. 103- 107 ,(1999) , 10.1006/GYNO.1999.5526
E. L. Kaplan, Paul Meier, Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations Springer Series in Statistics. ,vol. 53, pp. 319- 337 ,(1992) , 10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_25
James W. Orr, James L. Holimon, Pamela F. Orr, Stage I corpus cancer: Is teletherapy necessary? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 176, pp. 777- 789 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70601-X
Edward Podczaski, Paul Kaminski, Karen Gurski, Colin MacNeill, John A. Stryker, Kishor Singapuri, Thomas E. Hackett, Joel Sorosky, Richard Zaino, Detection and patterns of treatment failure in 300 consecutive cases of “early” endometrial cancer after primary surgery Gynecologic Oncology. ,vol. 47, pp. 323- 327 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0090-8258(92)90134-5
Abraham Kuten, Perry W. Grigsby, Carlos A. Perez, Barbara Fineberg, Delia M. Garcia, Joseph R. Simpson, Results of radiotherapy in recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 51 patients. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 17, pp. 29- 34 ,(1989) , 10.1016/0360-3016(89)90366-0
Howard D. Homesley, Nicholas Kadar, Rolland J. Barrett, Samuel S. Lentz, Selective pelvic and periaortic lymphadenectomy does not increase morbidity in surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 167, pp. 1225- 1230 ,(1992) , 10.1016/S0002-9378(11)91693-7
Dasarahally S. Mohan, Michael A. Samuels, Mostafa A. Selim, Abdelwahab D. Shalodi, Rodney J. Ellis, Judith R. Samuels, Hyun J. Yun, Long-Term Outcomes of Therapeutic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Stage I Endometrial Adenocarcinoma Gynecologic Oncology. ,vol. 70, pp. 165- 171 ,(1998) , 10.1006/GYNO.1998.5098