Responsive evaluation: Its meaning and special contribution to health promotion

作者: Tineke A. Abma

DOI: 10.1016/J.EVALPROGPLAN.2005.04.003

关键词:

摘要: Responsive evaluation offers a vision and rationale for evaluation. In this vision, is reframed from the assessment of program interventions on basis policymakers' goals to an engagement with all stakeholders about effectiveness their practice. This approach especially appropriate field health promotion given emerging ideas congruency between underlying values responsive promotion. article presents theory methodology discusses several controversial issues among them nature evidence political question: who should determine what counts as evidence? The value meaning are illustrated by case example. It concerns injury prevention students in two performing art schools.

参考文章(36)
Lincoln Ys, Fourth generation evaluation, the paradigm revolution and health promotion. Canadian Journal of Public Health-revue Canadienne De Sante Publique. ,(1992)
Tineke A. Abma, Evaluating palliative care: facilitating reflexive dialogues about an ambiguous concept. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy. ,vol. 4, pp. 261- 276 ,(2001) , 10.1023/A:1012096917865
Anton J. Kuzel, Janice M. Morse, Janice M. Swanson, The Nature of Qualitative Evidence ,(2001)
M. Goodstadt, J. Springett, L. Potvin, D. V. McQueen, B. Hyndman, E. Ziglio, I. Rootman, Evaluation in health promotion : principles and perspectives Evaluation in health promotion: principles and perspectives.. ,(2001)
Egon G. Guba, Yvonna S. Lincoln, Fourth Generation Evaluation ,(1989)
Lyn M. Shulha, J.Bradley Cousins, Evaluation use: Theory, research, and practice since 1986 Evaluation Practice. ,vol. 18, pp. 195- 208 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0886-1633(97)90027-1
Gert Jan Van Der Wilt, Rob Reuzel, Assessment of Health Technologies Which Issues Should be Addressed Evaluation. ,vol. 4, pp. 351- 358 ,(1998) , 10.1177/13563899822208644
Tineke A. Abma, Jennifer C. Greene, Ove Karlsson, Katherine Ryan, Thomas A. Schwandt, Guy A.M. Widdershoven, Dialogue on Dialogue Evaluation. ,vol. 7, pp. 164- 180 ,(2001) , 10.1177/135638900100700202
Guy A. M. Widdershoven, Dialogue in Evaluation: A Hermeneutic Perspective: Evaluation. ,vol. 7, pp. 253- 263 ,(2001) , 10.1177/13563890122209676
Robert E. Stake, To Evaluate an Arts Program The Journal of Aesthetic Education. ,vol. 10, pp. 115- ,(1976) , 10.2307/3332066