The potential to use QSAR to populate ecotoxicity characterisation factors for simplified LCIA and chemical prioritisation

作者: Hanna Holmquist , Jenny Lexén , Magnus Rahmberg , Ullrika Sahlin , Julia Grönholdt Palm

DOI: 10.1007/S11367-018-1452-X

关键词:

摘要: Purpose: Today’s chemical society use and emit an enormous number of different, potentially ecotoxic, chemicals to the environment. The vast majority substances do not have characterisation factors describing their ecotoxicity potential. A first stage, high throughput, screening tool is needed for prioritisation which need further measures. Methods: USEtox were calculated in this work based on data generated by quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models expand substance coverage where missing. Existing QSAR physico-chemical used, fill gaps, algae model was developed. existing used as reference evaluate impact from QSARs generate input USEtox, with focus data. An inventory that make up Swedish societal stock plastic additives, associated predicted emissions, a case study rank according Results discussion: For 210 inventory, only 41 had database. With data, additional 89 could be calculated, substantially improving ranking. choice shown important reliability results, but also best correlated discrepancies between estimated experimental very large. Conclusions: basis calculation factors, those ranking potential, assessed feasible way gather large datasets. However, research development guidance how achieve improvement accuracy results.

参考文章(19)
C. J. van Leeuwen, T. G. Vermeire, Risk assessment of chemicals : an introduction Springer. ,(2007)
Peter Carsten von der Ohe, Valeria Dulio, Jaroslav Slobodnik, Eric De Deckere, Ralph Kühne, Ralf-Uwe Ebert, Antoni Ginebreda, Ward De Cooman, Gerrit Schüürmann, Werner Brack, A new risk assessment approach for the prioritization of 500 classical and emerging organic microcontaminants as potential river basin specific pollutants under the European Water Framework Directive Science of The Total Environment. ,vol. 409, pp. 2064- 2077 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2011.01.054
T. E. McKone, The Precision of QSAR Methods For Estimating Intermedia Transfer Factors in Exposure Assessments Sar and Qsar in Environmental Research. ,vol. 1, pp. 41- 51 ,(1993) , 10.1080/10629369308028815
C. Alfonsín, A. Hospido, F. Omil, M.T. Moreira, G. Feijoo, PPCPs in wastewater – Update and calculation of characterization factors for their inclusion in LCA studies Journal of Cleaner Production. ,vol. 83, pp. 245- 255 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2014.07.024
Peter P. Egeghy, Daniel A. Vallero, Elaine A. Cohen Hubal, Exposure-based prioritization of chemicals for risk assessment Environmental Science & Policy. ,vol. 14, pp. 950- 964 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.ENVSCI.2011.07.010
Elorri Igos, Ruth Moeller, Enrico Benetto, Arno Biwer, Mélanie Guiton, Philippe Dieumegard, Development of USEtox characterisation factors for dishwasher detergents using data made available under REACH Chemosphere. ,vol. 100, pp. 160- 166 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2013.11.041
Tuomas Mattila, Matti Verta, Jyri Seppälä, Comparing priority setting in integrated hazardous substance assessment and in life cycle impact assessment International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 16, pp. 788- 794 ,(2011) , 10.1007/S11367-011-0295-5
Michael Z. Hauschild, Mark Huijbregts, Olivier Jolliet, Matt Macleod, Manuele Margni, Dik van de Meent, Ralph K. Rosenbaum, Thomas E. McKone, Building a model based on scientific consensus for Life Cycle Impact Assessment of chemicals: the search for harmony and parsimony. Environmental Science & Technology. ,vol. 42, pp. 7032- 7037 ,(2008) , 10.1021/ES703145T
Ralph K. Rosenbaum, Till M. Bachmann, Lois Swirsky Gold, Mark A. J. Huijbregts, Olivier Jolliet, Ronnie Juraske, Annette Koehler, Henrik F. Larsen, Matthew MacLeod, Manuele Margni, Thomas E. McKone, Jérôme Payet, Marta Schuhmacher, Dik van de Meent, Michael Z. Hauschild, USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 13, pp. 532- 546 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S11367-008-0038-4