作者: Jessica Stander , Karen Grimmer , Yolandi Brink
DOI: 10.1186/S12909-018-1121-6
关键词:
摘要: Research training programmes are a knowledge translation (KT) intervention which aim to improve research evidence uptake by clinicians. Whilst KT have been reported significantly physiotherapists, it is unclear aspects of optimally assist into physiotherapy practice. The purpose the review was establish body regarding physiotherapists’ use evidence-based practice (EBP) and clinical guidelines (CPG). A systematic scoping undertaken in line with adapted Arksey O’Malley framework. Nine electronic databases (CINAHL, BIOMED CENTRAL, Cochrane, Web Science, PROQUEST, PUBMED, OTseeker, Scopus, ERIC) were searched. Targeted keywords identified primary articles any hierarchy, that described nature impact for physiotherapists. Where reviews identified, component studies considered individually relevance. Critical appraisal not due review, data descriptively. Ten (yielding four relevant studies). Five additional (two randomised controlled trials, two non-randomised trials one pre-post study) included original reviews. This provided nine eligible review. strategies all multi-faceted. Interactive sessions, didactic printed material discussion feedback consistently associated effective outcomes. When addressed local barriers EBP utilisation, there better success rates CPG uptake, irrespective outcome measures used. There no consistent ways measuring outcome. Multi-faceted designed address most improving EBP/ among