Improving project processes: best practice case study

作者: M. Sarshar , R. Haigh , D. Amaratunga

DOI: 10.1108/14714170410815015

关键词:

摘要: This paper describes SPICE (Structure Process Improvement for Construction Enterprises), which is a process improvement framework construction organizations. five level step by maturity framework. It assesses an organization’s performance against levels of maturity, identifies their strengths and weaknesses highlights priorities. was developed in close collaboration with the industry tested on real projects. allowed to take into account practical industrial needs. provides outline focuses best practice case study implementation partnering relationship between major client contractor. The details assessment fact finding process. Based this assessment, it operation specific guidelines project improvement. Main included: (1) physical proximity client, design management teams; (2) top commitment improve productivity; (3) adoption manufacturing philosophies methods order deliver improvements. lack integration systems processes organizations; presence cultural incentive differences organizations, led fragmentation little evidence evaluation efforts teams. these, some recommendations are made future

参考文章(7)
Mark C. Paulk, Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1 Defense Technical Information Center. ,(1993) , 10.21236/ADA263403
H. Saiedian, R. Kuzara, SEI capability maturity model's impact on contractors IEEE Computer. ,vol. 28, pp. 16- 26 ,(1995) , 10.1109/2.362633
David James Bryde, Lynne Robinson, None, Client versus contractor perspectives on project success criteria International Journal of Project Management. ,vol. 23, pp. 622- 629 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.IJPROMAN.2005.05.003
Mark C. Paulk, Mary Beth Chrissis, Charles V. Weber, Bill Curtis, The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process ,(1994)
M. SARSHAR, R. HAIGH, M. FINNEMORE, G. AOUAD, P. BARRETT, D. BALDRY, M. SEXTON, SPICE: a business process diagnostics tool for construction projects Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. ,vol. 7, pp. 241- 250 ,(2000) , 10.1108/EB021149
Eric R. Ziegel, R. Kaplan, D. Norton, The Balanced Scorecard Technometrics. ,vol. 40, pp. 266- ,(1998) , 10.2307/1271199