Current perspectives in fragment-based lead discovery (FBLD)

作者: Bas Lamoree , Roderick E. Hubbard

DOI: 10.1042/EBC20170028

关键词:

摘要: It is over 20 years since the first fragment-based discovery projects were disclosed. The methods are now mature for most ‘conventional’ targets in drug such as enzymes (kinases and proteases) but there has also been growing success on more challenging targets, disruption of protein–protein interactions. main application to identify tractable chemical startpoints that non-covalently modulate activity a biological molecule. In this essay, we overview current practice discuss how they have had an impact lead – generating large number fragment-derived compounds clinical trials two medicines treating patients. addition, some recent applications biology providing tools investigate molecules, mechanisms systems.

参考文章(56)
Hamid R. Nasiri, Neil M. Bell, Keith I. E. McLuckie, Jarmila Husby, Chris Abell, Stephen Neidle, Shankar Balasubramanian, Targeting a c-MYC G-quadruplex DNA with a fragment library. Chemical Communications. ,vol. 50, pp. 1704- 1707 ,(2014) , 10.1039/C3CC48390H
Michèle N. Schulz, Jens Landström, Roderick E. Hubbard, MTSA--a Matlab program to fit thermal shift data. Analytical Biochemistry. ,vol. 433, pp. 43- 47 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.AB.2012.10.020
Miles Congreve, Robin Carr, Chris Murray, Harren Jhoti, A 'rule of three' for fragment-based lead discovery? Drug Discovery Today. ,vol. 8, pp. 876- 877 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S1359-6446(03)02831-9
Wan F. Lau, Jane M. Withka, David Hepworth, Thomas V. Magee, Yuhua J. Du, Gregory A. Bakken, Michael D. Miller, Zachary S. Hendsch, Venkataraman Thanabal, Steve A. Kolodziej, Li Xing, Qiyue Hu, Lakshmi S. Narasimhan, Robert Love, Maura E. Charlton, Samantha Hughes, Willem P. van Hoorn, James E. Mills, Design of a multi-purpose fragment screening library using molecular complexity and orthogonal diversity metrics Journal of Computer-aided Molecular Design. ,vol. 25, pp. 621- 636 ,(2011) , 10.1007/S10822-011-9434-0
W. P. Jencks, On the attribution and additivity of binding energies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 78, pp. 4046- 4050 ,(1981) , 10.1073/PNAS.78.7.4046
Andrew L. Hopkins, Colin R. Groom, Alexander Alex, Ligand efficiency: a useful metric for lead selection. Drug Discovery Today. ,vol. 9, pp. 430- 431 ,(2004) , 10.1016/S1359-6446(04)03069-7
Valerie Vivat Hannah, C Atmanene, D Zeyer, A Van Dorsselaer, Sarah Sanglier-Cianférani, Native MS: an 'ESI' way to support structure- and fragment-based drug discovery. Future Medicinal Chemistry. ,vol. 2, pp. 35- 50 ,(2010) , 10.4155/FMC.09.141
Hans-Joachim Boehm, Markus Boehringer, Daniel Bur, Hans Gmuender, Walter Huber, Werner Klaus, Dirk Kostrewa, Holger Kuehne, Thomas Luebbers, Nathalie Meunier-Keller, Francis Mueller, Novel inhibitors of DNA gyrase: 3D structure based biased needle screening, hit validation by biophysical methods, and 3D guided optimization. A promising alternative to random screening. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. ,vol. 43, pp. 2664- 2674 ,(2000) , 10.1021/JM000017S
Rand M. Miller, Ville O. Paavilainen, Shyam Krishnan, Iana M. Serafimova, Jack Taunton, Electrophilic Fragment-Based Design of Reversible Covalent Kinase Inhibitors Journal of the American Chemical Society. ,vol. 135, pp. 5298- 5301 ,(2013) , 10.1021/JA401221B
David C. Rees, Miles Congreve,, Christopher W. Murray, Robin Carr, Fragment-based lead discovery Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. ,vol. 3, pp. 660- 672 ,(2004) , 10.1038/NRD1467