From paradox to principles: where next for scientific advice to governments?

作者: Peter Gluckman , James Wilsdon

DOI: 10.1057/PALCOMMS.2016.77

关键词:

摘要: Scientific advice to governments has never been in greater demand; nor it more contested. From climate change cyber-security, poverty pandemics, food technologies fracking, the questions being asked of scientists, engineers and other experts by policymakers, media wider public continue multiply increase complexity. At same time, authority legitimacy are under increasing scrutiny. This thematic article collection (‘special issue’) brings together perspectives on theory, practice politics scientific that build conclusions landmark conference Auckland August 2014, which led creation International Network for Government Science Advice (INGSA). We hope new papers will be added this over next year beyond, making a living, fully open access repository scholarship policy thinking—and an important contribution emerging science art advice.

参考文章(18)
Silvio O. Funtowicz, Jerome R. Ravetz, Science for the post-normal age Futures. ,vol. 25, pp. 739- 755 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L
Mark Woolhouse, Jeremy Farrar, None, Policy: An intergovernmental panel on antimicrobial resistance Nature. ,vol. 509, pp. 555- 557 ,(2014) , 10.1038/509555A
Willie Siyanbola, Adedamola Adeyeye, Olawale Olaopa, Omowumi Hassan, None, Science, technology and innovation indicators in policy-making: the Nigerian experience Palgrave Communications. ,vol. 2, pp. 1- 9 ,(2016) , 10.1057/PALCOMMS.2016.15
Yasushi Sato, Tateo Arimoto, Five years after Fukushima: scientific advice in Japan Palgrave Communications. ,vol. 2, pp. 1- 9 ,(2016) , 10.1057/PALCOMMS.2016.25
Xiaoxuan Li, Kejia Yang, Xiaoxi Xiao, Scientific advice in China: the changing role of the Chinese Academy of Sciences Palgrave Communications. ,vol. 2, pp. 1- 8 ,(2016) , 10.1057/PALCOMMS.2016.45